Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520664›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2020

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Steven-Johnson Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review.

Olivia A Charlton, Victoria Harris, Kevin Phan, Erin Mewton, Chris Jackson, Alan Cooper

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Outcomes of SJS/TEN: A Nationwide Analysis.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Photodistributed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2025
    Article
  20. Updates in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN.Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology · 2025
    Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia A CharltonDepartment of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Victoria HarrisDepartment of Dermatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Kevin PhanDepartment of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Erin MewtonDepartment of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Chris JacksonNorthern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Alan CooperDepartment of Dermatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AUPrince of Wales Hospital · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Holistic HealthAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnimalsBandagesBurn UnitsCyclosporineHospitalizationHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsLength of StayNutritional SupportPalliative CarePatient Care TeamSkinSkin TransplantationAdrenal Cortex HormonesCyclosporineImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Factorsdrug reactionSteve–Johnson syndrometoxic epidermal necrolysis

Identifiers

PMID32520664
PMCPMC7307670
OpenAlexW2995672816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.