Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520531›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2020

Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Kevin Maik Jablonka, Daniele Ongari, Seyed Mohamad Moosavi, Berend Smit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Manipulating Thermal Transport of 2D MOFs by Hierarchical Structural Design.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oxidative Ring-Opening of Dimethylfuran in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks through Computational Design.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin Maik JablonkaLaboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4894-4660
Daniele OngariLaboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-2901
Seyed Mohamad MoosaviLaboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0357-5729
Berend SmitLaboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques (ISIC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4653-8562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By combining metal nodes with organic linkers we can potentially synthesize millions of possible metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). The fact that we have so many materials opens many exciting avenues but also create new challenges. We simply have too many materials to be processed using conventional, brute force, methods. In this review, we show that having so many materials allows us to use big-data methods as a powerful technique to study these materials and to discover complex correlations. The first part of the review gives an introduction to the principles of big-data science. We show how to select appropriate training sets, survey approaches that are used to represent these materials in feature space, and review different learning architectures, as well as evaluation and interpretation strategies. In the second part, we review how the different approaches of machine learning have been applied to porous materials. In particular, we discuss applications in the field of gas storage and separation, the stability of these materials, their electronic properties, and their synthesis. Given the increasing interest of the scientific community in machine learning, we expect this list to rapidly expand in the coming years.

Indexed as

Data ScienceMachine LearningMaterials TestingMetal-Organic FrameworksParticle SizePorositySurface PropertiesMetal-Organic Frameworks

Identifiers

PMID32520531
PMCPMC7453404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.