ArticleJAMA network open2020
Evaluation of Availability of Survey Data About Cannabis Use.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adult-use cannabis legalization in the united states: a scoping review of outcome monitoring recommendations.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Using an intersectional framework to explore cannabis and tobacco co-use patterns: Protocol for a descriptive study.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Cannabis products and trends in a cohort of young adults: The VapeScan longitudinal study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Association of Cannabis Use With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Recreational cannabis legislation and binge drinking in U.S. adolescents and adults.The International journal on drug policy · 2023Article
- Nationally representative surveys on cannabis use lack product details relevant to public health.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2023Article
- A daily diary investigation of cannabis use and its diet and exercise correlates.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Association of Recreational Cannabis Legalization With Alcohol Use Among Adults in the US, 2010 to 2019.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Reasons for individual and concurrent use of vaped nicotine and cannabis: their similarities, differences, and association with product use.Journal of cannabis research · 2021Article
- Changes in Cannabis Consumption During the Global COVID-19 Lockdown: The International COVISTRESS Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Cannabis Effects on Driving Performance: Clinical Considerations.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsArticle
- A Scoping Review of Data Sources for the Conduct of Policy-Relevant Substance Use Research.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In response to increasing public support for cannabis legalization, understanding associations of state and federal policy changes related to cannabis legalization with patterns of cannabis use is important. A challenge for public health monitoring and research is significant variation in data availability related to cannabis use behaviors and perceptions across and within states and over time, including the availability of prelegalization vs postlegalization data. Objective: To review data available on cannabis use and related behaviors over time in Massachusetts and the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series examined state and national surveys on public health and related behaviors and outcomes to review availability of cannabis-related data for Massachusetts for 8 key indicators over time. Additionally, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System for all states were reviewed. The analysis was conducted between February 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020. Exposures: Surveys that enable state-level estimation of cannabis use and related behaviors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Eight key indicators related to cannabis use behaviors and perceptions: lifetime cannabis use, age of initiation, frequency of use, location of use, method of use, source of cannabis, perceptions of cannabis, and reason for use (ie, medical vs nonmedical). Results: There were 7 surveys that monitored cannabis use and related behaviors in Massachusetts for adolescents and adults. No surveys monitored all 8 indicators of interest, and availability over time was limited. In the most recent BRFSS, 24 states asked cannabis-related questions, meaning BRFSS data on cannabis use was lacking for more than half of the US adult population. In the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, 36 states asked standard cannabis questions; most other states had at least 1 question related to cannabis use and frequency. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings of limitations of existing surveys, and particularly the lack of national questions in the BRFSS and Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, suggest that available data have substantial limitations for monitoring cannabis use. As cannabis policy changes continue, there is a need to remain focused on the availability of high-quality data sources that allow for critical public health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.