ArticleJAMA dermatology2020
The Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases in the United States From 1990 to 2017.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: Insights from the GBD 2021 study.iScience · 2026Article
- The neglected majority: Inverse relationship between prevalence and global research activity of 15 dermatological diseases.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Article
- Global, regional and national burden of skin and subcutaneous diseases: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.International health · 2026Article
- Retrospective Epidemiological Analyses of 12,976 Culture-Positive Superficial Fungal Infections in Shanghai, East China.Mycoses · 2026Observational
- A Global Study of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases Among Individuals Under 20 Years of Age.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Review on the Application of Biologic Factors in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Dermatology research and practice · 2026Review
- Burden of malignant melanoma among the elderly population in East Asia from 1990 to 2023 and machine learning projection to 2040.PloS one · 2026Article
- Diverging Global Patterns and Temporal Trends in Inflammatory and Infectious Skin Diseases.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- [Disease burden of spinal fractures in China from 1990 to 2021 and temporal trends: A comparative analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Recent progress in the identification and in vitro culture of skin organoids.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- The financial impact and utilization of inpatient dermatology services: historical insights and future implications.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Review
- Global burden of viral skin diseases from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Analysis and comparison of the trends in burden of malignant cutaneous melanoma in East Asian countries and regions and worldwide from 1991 to 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The burden of skin diseases in China: global burden of Disease Study 2019.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: Successes, Milestones, and Upcoming Innovation.Nucleic acid therapeutics · 2024Review
- The influence of viscosity of hydrogels on the spreading and migration of cells in 3D bioprinted skin cancer models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases in Indonesia 1990 to 2019.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2023Article
- Common Skin Diseases and Their Psychosocial Impact among Jazan Population, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey during 2023.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Observational
- Association between inequalities in human resources for health and all cause and cause specific mortality in 172 countries and territories, 1990-2019: observational study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Observational
- Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in dermatology (PUSH-D): Development and validation of a dermatology-specific stigmatization assessment tool.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Skin and subcutaneous diseases affect the health of millions of individuals in the US. Data are needed that highlight the geographic trends and variations of skin disease burden across the country to guide health care decision-making. Objective: To characterize trends and variations in the burden of skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases across the US from 1990 to 2017. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this cohort study, data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD), a study with an online database that incorporates current and previous epidemiological studies of disease burden, and from GBD 2017, which includes more than 90 000 data sources such as systematic reviews, surveys, population-based disease registries, hospital inpatient and outpatient data, cohort studies, and autopsy data. The GBD separated skin conditions into 15 subcategories according to incidence, prevalence, adequacy of data, and standardized disease definitions. GBD 2017 also estimated the burden from melanoma of the skin and keratinocyte carcinoma. Data analysis for the present study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 31, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary study outcomes included age-standardized disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), incidence, and prevalence. The data were stratified by US states with the highest and lowest age-standardized DALY rate per 100 000 people, incidence, and prevalence of each skin condition. The percentage change in DALY rates in each state was calculated from 1990 to 2017. Results: Overall, age-standardized DALY rates for skin and subcutaneous diseases increased from 1990 (821.6; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], 570.3-1124.9) to 2017 (884.2; 95% UI, 614.0-1207.9) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The degree of increase varied according to geographic location, with the largest percentage change of 0.12% (95% UI, 0.09%-0.15%) in New York and the smallest percentage change of 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in Colorado, 0.04% (95% UI, 0.01%-0.06%) in Nevada, 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in New Mexico, and 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in Utah. The age-standardized DALY rate, incidence, and prevalence of specific skin conditions differed among the states. New York had the highest age-standardized DALY rate for skin and subcutaneous disease in 2017 (1097.0 [95% UI, 764.9-1496.1]), whereas Wyoming had the lowest age-standardized DALY rate (672.9 [95% UI, 465.6-922.3]). In all 50 states and the District of Columbia, women had higher age-standardized DALY rates for overall skin and subcutaneous diseases than men (women: 971.20 [95% UI, 676.76-1334.59] vs men: 799.23 [95% UI, 559.62-1091.50]). However, men had higher DALY rates than women for malignant melanoma (men: 80.82 [95% UI, 51.68-123.18] vs women: 42.74 [95% UI, 34.05-70.66]) and keratinocyte carcinomas (men: 37.56 [95% UI, 29.35-49.52] vs women: 14.42 [95% UI, 10.01-20.66]). Conclusions and Relevance: Data from the GBD suggest that the burden of skin and subcutaneous disease was large and that DALY rate trends varied across the US; the age-standardized DALY rate for keratinocyte carcinoma appeared greater in men. These findings can be used by states to target interventions and meet the needs of their population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.