ArticleGigaScience2020
Metagenomic analysis of planktonic riverine microbial consortia using nanopore sequencing reveals insight into river microbe taxonomy and function.
Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disentangling abiotic and biotic effects of treated wastewater on stream biofilm resistomes enables the discovery of a new planctomycete beta-lactamase.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Article
- Metaviromic analyses of DNA virus community from sediments of the N-Choe stream, North India.Virus research · 2023Article
- Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023Review
- Metagenomic mapping of cyanobacteria and potential cyanotoxin producing taxa in large rivers of the United States.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Rapid on-site detection of harmful algal blooms: real-time cyanobacteria identification using Oxford Nanopore sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Review
- The Persistence of Bacterial Pathogens in Surface Water and Its Impact on Global Food Safety.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanopore-Based Surveillance of Zoonotic Bacterial Pathogens in Farm-Dwelling Peridomestic Rodents.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Perspectives and Benefits of High-Throughput Long-Read Sequencing in Microbial Ecology.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Review
- Nanopore Technology and Its Applications in Gene Sequencing.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Is Oxford Nanopore sequencing ready for analyzing complex microbiomes?FEMS microbiology ecology · 2021Article
- Microbial diversity characterization of seawater in a pilot study using Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Freshwater monitoring by nanopore sequencing.eLife · 2021Article
- Epipelagic microbiome of the Small Aral Sea: Metagenomic structure and ecological diversity.MicrobiologyOpen · 2021Article
- Metagenomic analysis of planktonic riverine microbial consortia using nanopore sequencing reveals insight into river microbe taxonomy and function.GigaScience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRiverine ecosystems are biogeochemical powerhouses driven largely by microbial communities that inhabit water columns and sediments. Because rivers are used extensively for anthropogenic purposes (drinking water, recreation, agriculture, and industry), it is essential to understand how these activities affect the composition of river microbial consortia. Recent studies have shown that river metagenomes vary considerably, suggesting that microbial community data should be included in broad-scale river ecosystem models. But such ecogenomic studies have not been applied on a broad "aquascape" scale, and few if any have applied the newest nanopore technology.
resultsWe investigated the metagenomes of 11 rivers across 3 continents using MinION nanopore sequencing, a portable platform that could be useful for future global river monitoring. Up to 10 Gb of data per run were generated with average read lengths of 3.4 kb. Diversity and diagnosis of river function potential was accomplished with 0.5-1.0 ⋅ 106 long reads. Our observations for 7 of the 11 rivers conformed to other river-omic findings, and we exposed previously unrecognized microbial biodiversity in the other 4 rivers.
conclusionsDeeper understanding that emerged is that river microbial consortia and the ecological functions they fulfil did not align with geographic location but instead implicated ecological responses of microbes to urban and other anthropogenic effects, and that changes in taxa manifested over a very short geographic space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.