Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520318›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Use of standardized body composition measurements and malnutrition screening tools to detect malnutrition risk and predict clinical outcomes in children with chronic conditions.

Nara E Lara-Pompa, Susan Hill, Jane Williams, Sarah Macdonald, Katherine Fawbert, Jane Valente, Kathy Kennedy, Vanessa Shaw, Jonathan C Wells, Mary Fewtrell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric undernutrition defined by body composition-are we there yet?The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nara E Lara-PompaChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Susan HillGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jane WilliamsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah MacdonaldGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine FawbertGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jane ValenteGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kathy KennedyChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa ShawGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan C WellsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Mary FewtrellChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, University College London Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter tools are needed to diagnose and identify children at risk of clinical malnutrition.

objectivesWe aimed to compare body composition (BC) and malnutrition screening tools (MSTs) for detecting malnutrition on admission; and examine their ability to predict adverse clinical outcomes [increased length of stay (LOS) and complications] in complex pediatric patients.

methodsThis was a prospective study in children 5-18 y old admitted to a tertiary pediatric hospital (n = 152). MSTs [Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS), Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP), and Screening Tool for Risk of Impaired Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids)] were completed on admission. Weight, height, and BC [fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) by DXA] were measured (n = 118). Anthropometry/BC and MSTs were compared with each other and with clinical outcomes.

resultsSubjects were significantly shorter with low LM compared to reference data. Depending on the diagnostic criteria used, 3%-17% were classified as malnourished. Agreement between BC/anthropometric parameters and MSTs was poor. STAMP and STRONGkids identified children with low weight, LM, and height. PYMS, and to a lesser degree STRONGkids, identified children with increased LOS, as did LM compared with weight or height. Patients with complications had lower mean ± SD LM SD scores (-1.38 ± 1.03 compared with -0.74 ± 1.40, P < 0.05). In multivariable models, PYMS high risk and low LM were independent predictors of increased LOS (OR: 3.76; 95% CI: 1.36, 10.35 and OR: 3.69; 95% CI: 1.24, 10.98, respectively). BMI did not predict increased LOS or complications.

conclusionsLM appears better than weight and height for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in this population. BMI was a poor diagnostic parameter. MSTs performed differently in associations to BC/anthropometry and clinical outcomes. PYMS and LM provided complementary information regarding LOS. Studies on specific patient populations may further clarify the use of these tools and measurements.

Indexed as

Body CompositionChild DevelopmentAdolescentAnthropometryChildChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleRisk Factorsbody compositionclinical outcomesmalnutritionnutritional riskpediatric patientsscreening

Identifiers

PMID32520318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.