Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520316›Full record

Observational studyJAMA psychiatry2020

Association of Naturalistic Administration of Cannabis Flower and Concentrates With Intoxication and Impairment.

L Cinnamon Bidwell, Jarrod M Ellingson, Hollis C Karoly, Sophie L YorkWilliams, Leah N Hitchcock, Brian L Tracy, Jost Klawitter, Cristina Sempio, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The role of subcortical brain tissue iron as an indicator of dopamine neurophysiology in adolescent cannabis use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L Cinnamon BidwellDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Jarrod M EllingsonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Hollis C KarolyInstitute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Sophie L YorkWilliamsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Leah N HitchcockInstitute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Brian L TracyDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Jost KlawitterDivision of Substance Dependence, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Cristina SempioDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Aurora.
Angela D BryanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Kent E HutchisonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder.
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USColorado State University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The rapidly growing legal cannabis market includes new and highly potent products, the effects of which, to our knowledge, have not previously been examined in biobehavioral research studies because of federal restrictions on cannabis research. Objective: To use federally compatible, observational methods to study high-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) legal market forms of cannabis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study with a between-groups design that was conducted in a community and university setting, cannabis flower users and concentrate users were randomly assigned to higher- vs lower-THC products within user groups. Participants completed a baseline and an experimental mobile laboratory assessment that included 3 points: before, immediately after, and 1 hour after ad libitum legal market flower and concentrate use. Of the 133 individuals enrolled and assessed, 55 regular flower cannabis users (41.4%) and 66 regular concentrate cannabis users (49.6%) complied with the study's cannabis use instructions and had complete data across primary outcomes. Exposures: Flower users were randomly assigned to use either 16% or 24% THC flower and concentrate users were randomly assigned to use either 70% or 90% THC concentrate that they purchased from a dispensary. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures included plasma cannabinoids, subjective drug intoxication, and neurobehavioral tasks testing attention, memory, inhibitory control, and balance. Results: A total of 121 participants completed the study for analysis: 55 flower users (mean [SD] age, 28.8 [8.1] years; 25 women [46%]) and 66 concentrate users (mean [SD] age, 28.3 [10.4] years; 30 women [45%]). Concentrate users compared with flower users exhibited higher plasma THC levels and 11-hydroxyΔ9-THC (THC's active metabolite) across all points. After ad libitum cannabis administration, mean plasma THC levels were 0.32 (SE = 0.43) μg/mL in concentrate users (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 3.18) and 0.14 (SE = 0.16) μg/mL in flower users. Most neurobehavioral measures were not altered by short-term cannabis consumption. However, delayed verbal memory (F1,203 = 32.31; P < .001) and balance function (F1,203 = 18.88; P < .001) were impaired after use. Differing outcomes for the type of product (flower vs concentrate) or potency within products were not observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides information about the association of pharmacological and neurobehavioral outcomes with legal market cannabis. Short-term use of concentrates was associated with higher levels of THC exposure. Across forms of cannabis and potencies, users' domains of verbal memory and proprioception-focused postural stability were primarily associated with THC administration.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCannabisCognitive DysfunctionDronabinolExecutive FunctionFemaleFlowersHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMalePlant ExtractsPostural BalanceSensation DisordersVerbal LearningYoung Adult11-hydroxy-delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinolDronabinolPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID32520316
PMCPMC7287943
OpenAlexW3033060622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.