Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520310›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Docking of peptides to GPCRs using a combination of CABS-dock with FlexPepDock refinement.

Aleksandra E Badaczewska-Dawid, Sebastian Kmiecik, Michał Koliński

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flexible Docking of Cyclic Peptides to Proteins Using CABS-dock.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleksandra E Badaczewska-Dawid
Sebastian Kmiecik
Michał KolińskiORCID 0000-0003-1047-2186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural description of peptide ligands bound to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is important for the discovery of new drugs and deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of life. Here we describe a three-stage protocol for the molecular docking of peptides to GPCRs using a set of different programs: (1) CABS-dock for docking fully flexible peptides; (2) PD2 method for the reconstruction of atomistic structures from C-alpha traces provided by CABS-dock and (3) Rosetta FlexPepDock for the refinement of protein-peptide complex structures and model scoring. We evaluated the proposed protocol on the set of seven different GPCR-peptide complexes (including one containing a cyclic peptide), for which crystallographic structures are available. We show that CABS-dock produces high resolution models in the sets of top-scored models. These sets of models, after reconstruction to all-atom representation, can be further improved by Rosetta high-resolution refinement and/or minimization, leading in most of the cases to sub-Angstrom accuracy in terms of interface root-mean-square-deviation measure.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMolecular Docking SimulationLigandsPeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledLigandsPeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledflexible dockingGPCR–peptide interactionmodel refinementpeptide dockingpeptide drugsreceptor–peptide complex

Identifiers

PMID32520310
PMCPMC8138832
OpenAlexW3033938335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.