Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519969›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020

Antimicrobial Resistance of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae in a Newly Implemented Surveillance Program in Uganda: Surveillance Report.

Meklit Workneh, Matthew M Hamill, Francis Kakooza, Emmanuel Mande, Jessica Wagner, Olive Mbabazi, Rodney Mugasha, Henry Kajumbula, Richard Walwema, Jonathan Zenilman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance inMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of Neisseria gonorrhoeae drug resistance development in South Africa.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Distribution and Factors Associated withInfectious disease reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meklit Workneh *Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9974-2340
Matthew M Hamill *Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-819X
Francis KakoozaInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4047-6620
Emmanuel MandeInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0587-8181
Jessica WagnerBayview Pediatric Unit, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0756-3474
Olive MbabaziInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-4755-5906
Rodney MugashaInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-0003
Henry KajumbulaInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-0007
Richard WalwemaInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-9009
Jonathan ZenilmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0244-6973
Patrick MusinguziAIDS Control Program, Division of Sexually Transmitted Infections, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-558X
Peter KyambaddeAIDS Control Program, Division of Sexually Transmitted Infections, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-9606-218X
Mohammed LamordeInfectious Disease Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-6822
Yukari C ManabeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8619-5598
Infectious Diseases Institute · UGJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe, Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN MICROBIAL DISEASEST32AI007291 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JOEL N BLANKSON, Sara Elizabeth Cosgrove · 1986 to 2026
$9.1M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007291NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeisseria gonorrhoeae (commonly known as gonorrhea) has developed resistance to all first-line therapy in Southeast Asia. East Africa has historically had absent or rudimentary gonorrhea surveillance programs and, while the existence of antimicrobial-resistant gonorrhea is recognized, the extent of its resistance is largely unknown. In 2016, the World Health Organization's Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (EGASP) was initiated in Uganda to monitor resistance trends.

objectiveThis study characterizes gonorrhea and antibiotic resistance in a large surveillance program of men with urethral discharge syndrome from Kampala, Uganda.

methodsMen attending sentinel clinics with urethritis provided demographic information, behavior data, and a urethral swab in line with the World Health Organization's EGASP protocols for culture, identification, and antibiotic-sensitivity testing using 2 methods-disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer test) and Etest (BioMérieux Inc). A subset of samples underwent detailed antimicrobial resistance testing.

resultsOf 639 samples collected from September 2016 to February 2018, 400 (62.6%) were culture-positive though 414 (64.8%) had microscopic evidence of gonorrhea. The mean age of the men from whom the samples were collected was 26.9 (SD 9.6) years and 7.2% (46/639) reported having HIV. There was high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and penicillin (greater than 90%) by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and 2.1% (4/188) had reduced azithromycin sensitivity by Etest. Of the early isolates that underwent detailed characterization, 60.3% (70/116) were culture-positive, 94% (66/69) isolates were either ciprofloxacin-resistant or ciprofloxacin-intermediate by Etest, 96% (65/68) were azithromycin-sensitive, and 96% (66/69) were gentamicin-sensitive. Resistance profiles were comparable between methods except for ceftriaxone (disk diffusion: 68/69, 99%; Etest: 67/69, 97%) and for gentamicin (disk diffusion: 2/8, 25%; Etest: 66/69, 96%) sensitivity.

conclusionsThis is the first report from a systematic gonorrhea surveillance program in Uganda. Findings demonstrated resistance or increased minimum inhibitory concentration to all key antigonococcal antibiotics. There was evidence of poor antibiotic stewardship, near-universal resistance to several antibiotics, and emerging resistance to others. Individuals in the population sampled were at exceptionally high risk of STI and HIV infection requiring intervention. Ongoing surveillance efforts to develop interventions to curtail antimicrobial-resistant gonorrhea are needed.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiximeCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinDemographyFemaleGonorrheaHumansMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaePenicillin GPopulation SurveillanceSentinel SurveillanceSpectinomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiximeCeftriaxoneCiprofloxacinPenicillin GSpectinomycinTetracyclineantibiotic resistance, EGASPantimicrobial resistancegonorrheaNeisseria Gonorrhoeaesexually transmittedSTDSTIsurveillanceUganda

Identifiers

PMID32519969
PMCPMC7315362
OpenAlexW3019512690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.