ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations: Qualitative Investigation.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of methods used for COVID-19 telehealth systems evaluation: lessons from past experiences for future use.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Evolution of Regional Information Infrastructures Integrating Health and Social Care in Scotland: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Implementing a Commercial AI Fracture Detection Tool in Health Care Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework: A Formative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges in implementing digital patient-centred cancer care in Europe-a qualitative study of several ESMO Designated Centres.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- The Regional Implementation of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Ambient Scribe in Primary and Secondary Care in England: Real-Time Qualitative Evaluation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- A critical realist exploration of hospital staff experiences of using nutrition dashboard technology.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Governance for safe and responsible AI in healthcare organisations: a scoping review of frameworks.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Large-scale system-level digitalisation initiatives in the National Health Service in England: insights from three national evaluations.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Balancing ideals and realities: health care professionals' perspectives of and attitudes toward digital patient-centered cancer care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Accessing digital harm reduction services -exploring the impact of the "Here4UScotland" application.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- How artificial intelligence is disrupting the field of medical knowledge and evaluation: a narrative review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- Recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in acute hospitals. Recording patient-reported wellness after Martha's rule.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Sociotechnical influences on the adoption and use of AI-enabled clinical decision support systems in ophthalmology: a theory-based interview study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Proactive process evaluation of precision medicine platforms: a roadmap.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- A mixed methods formative evaluation of the United Kingdom National Health Service Artificial Intelligence Lab.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Recommendations to promote the digital healthcare transformation in the clinical practice: findings from an international consensus development method.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Suitable Evaluation Frameworks for Disease-Agnostic Platforms for Remote Patient Monitoring: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the COVID-19 testing strategy in PHC of a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, 2020-2022.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Qualitative analysis to explore the barriers and facilitators around the implementation of automated dispensing cabinets at a large NHS Trust in England.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Health IT Implementation and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinician-IT Dynamics: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently a lack of comprehensive, intuitive, and usable formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations. We therefore sought to develop and apply such a framework. This study describes the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework we developed.
objectiveThe aim was to develop and apply a formative evaluation framework for HIT implementations, highlighting interrelationships between identified dimensions and offering guidance for implementers.
methodsWe drew on an initial prototype framework developed as part of a literature review exploring factors for the effective implementation of HIT. In addition, we used qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of different HIT interventions (electronic health record, electronic prescribing, and clinical decision support functionality). The combined data set comprised 19 case studies of primarily hospital settings, and included 703 semistructured interviews, 663 hours of observations, and 864 documents gathered from a range of care settings across National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Scotland. Data analysis took place over a period of 10 years and was guided by a framework informed by the existing evidence base.
resultsTPOM dimensions are intimately related and each include a number of subthemes that evaluators need to consider. Although technological functionalities are crucial in getting an initiative off the ground, system design needs to be cognizant of the accompanying social and organizational transformations required to ensure that technologies deliver the desired value for a variety of stakeholders. Wider structural changes, characterized by shifting policy landscapes and markets, influence technologies and the ways they are used by organizations and staff.
conclusionsThe TPOM framework supports formative evaluations of HIT implementation and digitally enabled transformation efforts. There is now a need for prospective application of the TPOM framework to determine its value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.