Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519966›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Technical and Psychosocial Challenges of mHealth Usage for Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among People Living With HIV in a Resource-Limited Setting: Case Series.

Kennedy Michael Ngowi, Furaha Lyamuya, Blandina T Mmbaga, Eva Muro, Zawadiel Hillu, Mary Shirima, Rob E Aarnoutse, Mirjam Ag Sprangers, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Peter Reiss and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kennedy Michael Ngowi *Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-5940
Furaha LyamuyaKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0136-2826
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5550-1916
Eva MuroKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-9497
Zawadiel HilluKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-2768
Mary ShirimaMajengo Dispensary, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0776-9456
Rob E AarnoutseRadboud Institute for Health Sciences & Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-969X
Mirjam Ag SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-6933
Pythia T NieuwkerkDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-1414
Peter ReissDepartment of Global Health and Division of infectious Diseases, Amsterdam institute of Global Health and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-6428
Marion Sumari-de BoerKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-0406
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLStichting HIV Monitoring · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile communication has been found to improve antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among people living with HIV. In an ongoing randomized clinical trial, 2 mobile communication strategies (ie, sending SMS text messages and real-time medication monitoring [RTMM]) were used to improve adherence to ART among people living with HIV in Tanzania. We noticed remarkable discrepancies between self-reported adherence and adherence recorded by SMS text messaging or RTMM among some of the first trial participants.

objectiveOur objective was to describe these cases and the observed discrepancies in more detail, to serve as a useful illustration of some of the challenges in using mobile health in resource-limited settings.

methodsIn an ongoing randomized trial, adults living with HIV from two HIV treatment centers in Tanzania who were suspected of low levels of adherence were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive (1) SMS text message reminders, (2) an RTMM device, or (3) no additional intervention to standard HIV care. During bimonthly study visits, the participants self-reported their level of adherence, received feedback about their level of adherence based on SMS text messaging or RTMM, and discussed strategies to overcome adherence problems with nurses providing HIV care. For the purpose of this report, we selected people living with HIV who had completed 5 follow-up visits and consistently reported more than 95% adherence, while SMS text messaging or RTMM recorded lower than 75% adherence. The participants were invited for a short, face-to-face in-depth interview to explore reasons for this discrepancy.

resultsAt the time of this analysis, 26 participants had completed follow-up. Six of these evidenced the above-mentioned discrepancies, with an average adherence of 46% based on SMS text messaging or RTMM, while self-reported adherence was 98%. Five of these 6 participants insisted that their adherence to ART was good, with 4 reporting that their adherence to properly using the monitoring device was low. Three participants mentioned concerns about involuntary disclosure of HIV status as a main reason for low adherence to using the device. Two participants were still depending on other reminder cues despite receiving SMS text message or RTMM reminders. Poor network coverage caused low adherence in 1 participant.

conclusionsPsychosocial barriers were reported as importantly contributing to low adherence, both with respect to use of ART and proper use of the adherence-monitoring device. This case series illustrates that when introducing new digital adherence monitoring technology, researchers should consider psychosocial barriers and distinguish between adherence to device use and adherence to treatment.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201712002844286; https://tinyurl.com/y98q4p3l.

Indexed as

adherenceantiretroviral therapycase seriesHIVmHealthreal-time medication monitoringSMS

Identifiers

PMID32519966
PMCPMC7315367
OpenAlexW3007268652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.