ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020
Real-world structure facilitates the rapid emergence of scene category information in visual brain signals.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Enhanced and idiosyncratic neural representations of personally typical scenes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Anchor objects drive realism while diagnostic objects drive categorization in GAN generated scenes.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Integrative processing in artificial and biological vision predicts the perceived beauty of natural images.Science advances · 2024Article
- Exploring the Representations of Individual Entities in the Brain Combining EEG and Distributional Semantics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Coherent natural scene structure facilitates the extraction of task-relevant object information in visual cortex.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Tracking cortical representations of facial attractiveness using time-resolved representational similarity analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In everyday life, our visual surroundings are not arranged randomly but structured in predictable ways. Although previous studies have shown that the visual system is sensitive to such structural regularities, it remains unclear whether the presence of an intact structure in a scene also facilitates the cortical analysis of the scene's categorical content. To address this question, we conducted an EEG experiment during which participants viewed natural scene images that were either "intact" (with their quadrants arranged in typical positions) or "jumbled" (with their quadrants arranged into atypical positions). We then used multivariate pattern analysis to decode the scenes' category from the EEG signals (e.g., whether the participant had seen a church or a supermarket). The category of intact scenes could be decoded rapidly within the first 100 ms of visual processing. Critically, within 200 ms of processing, category decoding was more pronounced for the intact scenes compared with the jumbled scenes, suggesting that the presence of real-world structure facilitates the extraction of scene category information. No such effect was found when the scenes were presented upside down, indicating that the facilitation of neural category information is indeed linked to a scene's adherence to typical real-world structure rather than to differences in visual features between intact and jumbled scenes. Our results demonstrate that early stages of categorical analysis in the visual system exhibit tuning to the structure of the world that may facilitate the rapid extraction of behaviorally relevant information from rich natural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.