Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519559›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Martin J Holzmann, Anwar J Siddiqui

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early invasive approach and outcome in elderly patients with NSTEACS: randomised trials, real-world data and guideline recommendations.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin J HolzmannDepartment of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Anwar J SiddiquiDepartment of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is a paucity of data on the benefit of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged >80 years with concurrent chronic kidney disease. Methods and Results Patients aged >80 years with chronic kidney disease, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min per 1.73 m

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RatePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHemorrhageHumansKidneyMaleNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionRecurrenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwedenTime Factorschronic kidney diseaseelderly patientsestimated glomerular filtration ratenon–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID32519559
PMCPMC7429052
OpenAlexW3033264214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.