ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
Evaluation of multiple gene targeting in porcine embryos by the CRISPR/Cas9 system using electroporation.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineered Protein Modification: A New Paradigm for Enhancing Biosensing Sensitivity and Diagnostic Accuracy.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Comparison Between Electroporation at Different Voltage Levels and Microinjection to Generate Porcine Embryos with Multiple Xenoantigen Knock-Outs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Embryo and fetal gene editing: Technical challenges and progress toward clinical applications.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Review
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Multiple gene editing in porcine embryos using a combination of microinjection, electroporation, and transfection methods.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Generation of mutant pigs by lipofection-mediated genome editing in embryos.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021Review
- 25th ANNIVERSARY OF CLONING BY SOMATIC-CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER: Nuclear transfer and the development of genetically modified/gene edited livestock.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- One-Step Generation of Multiple Gene-Edited Pigs by Electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 System into Zygotes to Reduce Xenoantigen Biosynthesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Electroporation-Mediated Genome Editing of Livestock Zygotes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 system now allows for unprecedented possibilities of genome editing. However, there are some limitations, including achieving efficient one-step multiple genome targeting to save costs, time, and ensure high quality. In the present study, we investigated the efficiency of one-step multiple gene modification by electroporation in porcine zygotes using pooled guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting CMAH, GHR, GGTA1, and PDX1. We first selected the best-performing gRNA from three different designs for each gene based on the effect on embryo development and mutation efficiency. The three gRNAs showed equivalent effects on the rates of blastocyst formation in each targeted gene; however, gRNAs CMAH #2, GHR #3, GGTA1 #3, and PDX1 #3 showed the highest biallelic mutation rate, although the total mutation rate of PDX1 #3 was significantly lower than that of PDX1 #1. Therefore, CMAH #2, GHR #3, GGTA1 #3, and PDX1 #1 were used as a mixture in electroporation to further clarify whether multiple genes can be targeted simultaneously. Individual sequencing of 43 blastocysts at the target sites of each gene showed mutations in one and two target genes in twenty-four (55.8%) and nine (20.9%) blastocysts, respectively. No mutation was detected in any target gene in ten (23.3%) blastocysts and no blastocysts had a mutation in three or more target genes. These results indicate that electroporation could effectively deliver multiple gRNAs and Cas9 protein into porcine zygotes to target multiple genes in a one-step process. However, the technique requires further development to increase the success rate of multiple gene modification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.