Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519310›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Evaluation of multiple gene targeting in porcine embryos by the CRISPR/Cas9 system using electroporation.

Maki Hirata, Manita Wittayarat, Zhao Namula, Quynh Anh Le, Qingyi Lin, Nhien Thi Nguyen, Koki Takebayashi, Yoko Sato, Fuminori Tanihara, Takeshige Otoi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maki HirataFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Manita WittayaratFaculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Zhao NamulaFaculty of Veterinary Science, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Quynh Anh LeFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Qingyi LinFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Nhien Thi NguyenFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Koki TakebayashiFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Yoko SatoSchool of Biological Science, Tokai University, Sapporo, Japan.
Fuminori TaniharaFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan. tanihara@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-5808
Takeshige OtoiFaculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Tokushima University · JPGuangdong Ocean University · CNPrince of Songkla University · THTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system now allows for unprecedented possibilities of genome editing. However, there are some limitations, including achieving efficient one-step multiple genome targeting to save costs, time, and ensure high quality. In the present study, we investigated the efficiency of one-step multiple gene modification by electroporation in porcine zygotes using pooled guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting CMAH, GHR, GGTA1, and PDX1. We first selected the best-performing gRNA from three different designs for each gene based on the effect on embryo development and mutation efficiency. The three gRNAs showed equivalent effects on the rates of blastocyst formation in each targeted gene; however, gRNAs CMAH #2, GHR #3, GGTA1 #3, and PDX1 #3 showed the highest biallelic mutation rate, although the total mutation rate of PDX1 #3 was significantly lower than that of PDX1 #1. Therefore, CMAH #2, GHR #3, GGTA1 #3, and PDX1 #1 were used as a mixture in electroporation to further clarify whether multiple genes can be targeted simultaneously. Individual sequencing of 43 blastocysts at the target sites of each gene showed mutations in one and two target genes in twenty-four (55.8%) and nine (20.9%) blastocysts, respectively. No mutation was detected in any target gene in ten (23.3%) blastocysts and no blastocysts had a mutation in three or more target genes. These results indicate that electroporation could effectively deliver multiple gRNAs and Cas9 protein into porcine zygotes to target multiple genes in a one-step process. However, the technique requires further development to increase the success rate of multiple gene modification.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsBlastocystCells, CulturedElectroporationFemaleFertilization in VitroGalactosyltransferasesGene TargetingGhrelinHomeodomain ProteinsMixed Function OxygenasesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSwineTrans-ActivatorsZygotealpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase 1, porcineCMPacetylneuraminate monooxygenaseGalactosyltransferasesGhrelinHomeodomain ProteinsMixed Function Oxygenasespancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 proteinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTrans-ActivatorsCRISPR/Cas9ElectroporationMultiplex targetingPorcineZygotes

Identifiers

PMID32519310
OpenAlexW3033008666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.