Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519300›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2021

Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages.

Sabeeh A Baig, Seth M Noar, Nisha C Gottfredson, Allison J Lazard, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Influencing Perceptions of Harm of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking Among One Member of Couples Who Use Waterpipe.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adolescents' Understanding of Smoking and Vaping Risk Language: Cognitive Interviews to Inform Scale Development.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Designing Environmental Messages to Discourage Red Meat Consumption: An Online Experiment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabeeh A BaigDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. sbaig1@alumni.jh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1482-7127
Seth M NoarHussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nisha C GottfredsonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Allison J LazardHussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.

Funding

Training & Education Program p294-308P50CA180907 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIBISL, KURT M. · 2013 to 2017
$20.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180907NCI NIH HHS P50CA180907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To select promising health messages, formative research has often relied on perceived message effectiveness (PME) scales assessing either of two related constructs, message perceptions (persuasive potential) and effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact). We sought to examine their incremental criterion validity within a comparative framework. Participants were 703 U.S. adult smokers (ages [Formula: see text] 21) who received anti-smoking or comparable control (littering) messages on their cigarette packs for 3 weeks. Structural equation models examined both PME constructs as simultaneous correlates of outcomes from the UNC Tobacco Warnings Model. Message perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with attention, an early behavioral antecedent ([Formula: see text] = 0.82, p < .001). Effects perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with later behavioral antecedents (range [Formula: see text] = 0.74-0.87, all p < .01) and quitting behaviors ([Formula: see text] = 0.36-0.66, all p < .001). Formative research on anti-smoking messages may benefit from focusing on effects perceptions to characterize potential for behavior change.

Indexed as

SmokersTobacco ProductsAdultHumansInfantPerceptionPersuasive CommunicationTobacco UseEffects perceptionsFormative researchMeasurementPerceived message effectivenessStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID32519300
PMCPMC9391031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.