ArticleHormones & cancer2020
Estrogen Receptor Positive and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Cancer: the Role of Hormone Therapy.
Article in Hormones & cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibitory Effect of Progesterone on Breast Cancer Progression and Migration via the Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.Oncology research · 2026Article
- The Age of Molecular Biomarkers: Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine. What Do Pathologists in Developing Countries Need to Know and Understand?International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Synergistic strength: unleashing exercise and polyphenols against breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological Evaluation of Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing on Endocrine Treatment: A Real-World Retrospective Study from a Regional Cancer Center.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Receptor tyrosine kinases and steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer:Metabolism open · 2024Review
- The role of adjuvant endocrine treatment in ER+, PR-, HER2- early breast cancer: a retrospective study of real-world data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Long non-coding RNAs affecting cell metabolism in cancer.Biology direct · 2022Review
- Hyaluronic acid-coated chitosan nanoparticles as targeted-carrier of tamoxifen against MCF7 and TMX-resistant MCF7 cells.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2022Article
- TAp63 regulates bone remodeling by modulating the expression of TNFRSF11B/Osteoprotegerin.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2021Article
- Emerging roles of the HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligases in hematological malignancies.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Lost but Not Least-Novel Insights into Progesterone Receptor Loss in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- Role of Phytonutrients in Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Perspective in Curing Breast Cancer.Biomolecules · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ER+/PR- (estrogen receptor positive and progesterone receptor negative) tumors constitute only a small portion of the breast cancer population. Patients with ER+/PR- tumors, however, are characterized by worse survival compared to patients with ER+/PR+ (estrogen receptor positive and progesterone receptor positive) tumors. Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of hormone blocking therapy for patients with ER+/PR- tumors. The NCDB was queried between 2004 and 2015, and patients with invasive ER+/PR- tumors were identified. We employed univariate Cox proportional hazards to compare outcomes among patients that did or did not receive hormone blocking therapy. We identified 138,398 patients with invasive ER+/PR- tumors, 32,044 (23%) of whom did not receive hormone blocking therapy. The reasons for not receiving hormone blocking therapy included contraindications to treatment, death, patient refusal, and unknown. There were no significant differences in race, income quartile, or education quartile between patients who did and did not receive hormone blocking therapy. Patients who did not receive hormone blocking therapy underwent surgical assessment of the axilla more frequently than those who did receive hormone therapy. Our analysis demonstrated that hormone blocking therapy administration was associated with increased overall survival for up to 10 years of follow up (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.56-0.59, p < 0.001). Hormone blocking therapy may be associated with increased survival for breast cancer patients with ER+/PR- tumors. Although this benefit may last for years after completion of the course, up to 25% of patients do not receive this treatment. Strategies to increase the utilization and adherence to hormone blocking therapy regimens may improve patient survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.