Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519242›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2020

Predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature.

Muhammad A Arshad, Ahmad Majzoub, Sandro C Esteves

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110391 (Sperm Retrieval Rates by Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men Subjected to Gonadotropin Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05110391 completednot on this map

Sperm Retrieval Rates by Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men Subjected to Gonadotropin Therapy

TypeobservationalSponsorANDROFERT - Clinica de Andrologia e Reproducao HumanaRan2014 to 2021Enrolled616ConditionsNon-obstructive Azoospermia, Hormone Deficiency, Hypogonadism, Male, Male InfertilityArmsHormonal Therapy Agent
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad A ArshadFatima Memorial Hospital College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-4584
Ahmad MajzoubDepartment of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-6241
Sandro C EstevesANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Av. Dr. Heitor Penteado, 1464, Campinas, São Paulo, 13075-460, Brazil. s.esteves@androfert.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-9680
Fatima Jinnah Medical University · PKUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), combined with surgical sperm retrieval (SR) techniques, is the sole option for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia to achieve fertility; however, with suboptimal results. Given the variability in clinical presentation, the potential role of factors that can predict the likelihood of successful testicular SR needs to be clarified. This article summarizes the current evidence concerning the variables predicting SR success in non-obstructive azoospermic patients with spermatogenic failure. For this, we used 60 articles, including 46 original papers and six meta-analyses. Clinical and laboratory factors, as well as adjuvant therapies and surgical retrieval methods, were the factors most commonly investigated. We found that Klinefelter syndrome, Y chromosome microdeletions in regions AZFa/b, and Sertoli cell-only histopathology were associated with reduced SR success. By contrast, testis volume > 12.5 ml, history of cryptorchidism, use of micro-TESE as the sperm retrieval method, and adjuvant therapy were associated with improved SR success. None of the predictors, alone or combined, provide definitive information about the chances of harvesting sperm in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, except for Y chromosome microdeletions in regions AZFa/b. In the latter, SR success is virtually nil. We conclude that SR outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia are difficult to predict based on the existing variables. Although several predictors can be used for patient counseling, their clinical value is limited to either ensure SR success or discourage reproductive urologists from recommending SR to men with non-obstructive azoospermia seeking fertility. A notable exception includes the deletions involving the regions AZFa and/or AZFb of the Y chromosome; the affected patients should be counseled against undergoing SR.

Indexed as

AzoospermiaSperm RetrievalHumansMalePrognosisTissue and Organ HarvestingMale infertilityNon-obstructive azoospermiaOutcome assessmentReviewSperm retrievalTestis

Identifiers

PMID32519242
OpenAlexW3033711244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.