Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519227›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2020

Non-replicability circumstances in a neural network model with Hodgkin-Huxley-type neurons.

Wilfredo Blanco, Paulo H Lopes, Anderson Abner de S Souza, Michael Mascagni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wilfredo BlancoComputer Science Department, State University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil. wilfredoblanco@uern.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-1291
Paulo H LopesComputer Science Department, State University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Anderson Abner de S SouzaComputer Science Department, State University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Michael MascagniComputer Science Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-4580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building upon previous experiments can be used to accomplish new goals. In computing, it is imperative to reuse computer code to continue development on specific projects. Reproducibility is a fundamental building block in science, and experimental reproducibility issues have recently been of great concern. It may be surprising that reproducibility is also of concern in computational science. In this study, we used a previously published code to investigate neural network activity and we were unable to replicate our original results. This led us to investigate the code in question, and we found that several different aspects, attributable to floating-point arithmetic, were the cause of these replicability issues. Furthermore, we uncovered other manifestations of this lack of replicability in other parts of the computation with this model. The simulated model is a standard system of ordinary differential equations, very much like those commonly used in computational neuroscience. Thus, we believe that other researchers in the field should be vigilant when using such models and avoid drawing conclusions from calculations if their qualitative results can be substantially modified through non-reproducible circumstances.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsReproducibility of ResultsFloating-point precisionNeural networkNumerical simulationReplicability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.