ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2020
Non-replicability circumstances in a neural network model with Hodgkin-Huxley-type neurons.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population bursts in a modular neural network as a mechanism for synchronized activity in KNDy neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of biophysical in silico neuron states and spikes from event-based partial histories.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Mitigating Computer Limitations in Replicating Numerical Simulations of a Neural Network Model With Hodgkin-Huxley-Type Neurons.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Building upon previous experiments can be used to accomplish new goals. In computing, it is imperative to reuse computer code to continue development on specific projects. Reproducibility is a fundamental building block in science, and experimental reproducibility issues have recently been of great concern. It may be surprising that reproducibility is also of concern in computational science. In this study, we used a previously published code to investigate neural network activity and we were unable to replicate our original results. This led us to investigate the code in question, and we found that several different aspects, attributable to floating-point arithmetic, were the cause of these replicability issues. Furthermore, we uncovered other manifestations of this lack of replicability in other parts of the computation with this model. The simulated model is a standard system of ordinary differential equations, very much like those commonly used in computational neuroscience. Thus, we believe that other researchers in the field should be vigilant when using such models and avoid drawing conclusions from calculations if their qualitative results can be substantially modified through non-reproducible circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32519227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.