Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519194›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2020

Prevalence and sort of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions in hospitalized psychiatric patients.

Gudrun Hefner, Jan Wolff, Martina Hahn, Christoph Hiemke, Sermin Toto, Sibylle C Roll, Thomas Messer, Ansgar Klimke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors associated with potential drug-drug interactions in psychiatric inpatients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gudrun HefnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vitos Klinikum Hochtaunus, Emil-Sioli-Weg 1-3, 61081, Friedrichsdorf, Germany. Gudrun.Hefner@vitos-rheingau.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5892-8993
Jan WolffDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Martina HahnPsychiatric Hospital, Vitos Klinik Eichberg, Eltville, Germany.
Christoph HiemkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sermin TotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sibylle C RollPsychiatric Hospital, Vitos Klinik Eichberg, Eltville, Germany.
Thomas MesserDanuvius Klinik GmbH, Technische Universität München, Pfaffenhofen an der Ilm, Germany.
Ansgar KlimkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vitos Klinikum Hochtaunus, Emil-Sioli-Weg 1-3, 61081, Friedrichsdorf, Germany.
Vitos · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric patients are high-risk patients for the development of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs), leading to highly variable (victim) drug serum concentrations. Avoiding and targeting high-risk drug combinations could reduce preventable adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Pharmacokinetic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated DDIs are often predictable and, therefore, preventable. The retrospective, longitudinal analysis used informations from a large pharmacovigilance study (Optimization of pharmacological treatment in hospitalized psychiatric patients study, study number 01VSF16009, 01/2017), conducted in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Medication data were examined for the co-prescription of clinically relevant CYP inhibitors or inducers and substrates of these enzymes (victim drugs). In total, data from 27,396 patient cases (45.6% female) with a mean (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) age of 47.3 ± 18.3 years were available for analysis. CYP inhibitors or inducers were at least once prescribed in 14.4% (n = 3946) of the cases. The most frequently prescribed CYP inhibitors were melperone (n = 2504, 28.1%) and duloxetine (n = 1324, 14.9%). Overall, 51.0% of the cases taking melperone were combined with a victim drug (n = 1288). Carbamazepine was the most frequently prescribed CYP inducer (n = 733, 88.8%). Combinations with victim drugs were detected for 58% (n = 427) of cases on medication with carbamazepine. Finally, a DDI was detected in 43.6% of the cases in which a CYP inhibitor or inducer was prescribed. The frequency of CYP-mediated DDI is considerably high in the psychiatric setting. Physicians should be aware of the CYP inhibitory and inducing potential of psychotropic and internistic drugs (especially, melperone).

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationsDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCytochrome P-450 Enzyme InhibitorsPharmaceutical PreparationsAntidepressantsAntipsychoticsCytochrome P450InteractionsPharmacokineticsPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID32519194
OpenAlexW3033027320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.