Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32519185›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2020

The Evidence for HIV Self-Testing to Increase HIV Testing Rates and the Implementation Challenges that Remain.

Elizabeth A Kelvin, Bridget Akasreku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Implementation determinants of HIV Self-Testing among young sexual minority men.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth A KelvinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, and CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, 55 West 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA. elizabeth.kelvin@sph.cuny.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-8697
Bridget AkasrekuDepartment of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, 55 West 125th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.

Funding

Patient and Population Health Outcomes Research SWGP30AI124414 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI Kathryn M. Anastos · 2017 to 2026
$28.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI124414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe describe the evidence regarding the impact of offering HIV self-testing (HIVST) and explore the gaps that need to be filled to design and implement HIVST programs. RECENT

findingsNumerous randomized controlled trials found that offering HIVST increases HIV testing rates. However, these trials used an oral HIVST that was provided for free and there is no research examining the impact of offering blood-based (finger prick) kits or charging for HIVST kits. The trials also used various methods for distributing the HIVST kits, but there is little research comparing distribution methods. Study participants varied in the HIV testing method they chose when given choices, suggesting that offering multiple HIV testing options may be needed to maximize testing rates. Despite the consistent finding that offering HIVST increases HIV testing rates, questions remain that need to be answered in order to maximize the potential of this new biomedical technology.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningReagent Kits, DiagnosticSelf CareSerologic TestsReagent Kits, DiagnosticHIVHIV self-testingImplementation science

Identifiers

PMID32519185
PMCPMC8915955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.