ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2020
Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- On Balancing Sharpness of Excitation Patterns, Loudness, and Potential Effects on Speech Perception with Cochlear-Implant Current-Focussing Strategies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Electroanatomic Twins of Cadaveric Cochleae: A Platform for Cochlear Implant Testing.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Listening effort among adult cochlear implant users: a protocol for a systematic review and measure-specific meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing.Hearing research · 2025Article
- Investigating the Effect of Blurring and Focusing Current in Cochlear Implant Users with the Panoramic ECAP Method.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Impact of reduced spectral resolution on temporal-coherence-based source segregation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Effects of selective stimulation of apical electrodes on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant recipients.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Electrical Field Interactions during Adjacent Electrode Stimulations: eABR Evaluation in Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Review
- An Instrumented Cochlea Model for the Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrical Stimulus Spread.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Evaluating Selective Apical Electrode Deactivation for Improving Cochlear Implant Outcomes.Trends in hearingArticle
- A Web-Based Listening Test System for Cochlear Implant Research and its Validation for Remote Testing.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- The Effect of Free-Field Presentation and Processing Strategy on a Measure of Spectro-Temporal Processing by Cochlear-Implant Listeners.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- Assessing Array-Type Differences in Cochlear Implant Users Using the Panoramic ECAP Method.Ear and hearingArticle
- Neural Decoding of the Speech Envelope: Effects of Intelligibility and Spectral Degradation.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) listeners struggle to understand speech in background noise. Interactions between electrode channels due to current spread increase the masking of speech by noise and lead to difficulties with speech perception. Strategies that reduce channel interaction therefore have the potential to improve speech-in-noise perception by CI listeners, but previous results have been mixed. We investigated the effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception and its association with spectro-temporal acuity in a listening study with 12 experienced CI users. Instead of attempting to reduce channel interaction, we introduced spectral blurring to simulate some of the effects of channel interaction by adjusting the overlap between electrode channels at the input level of the analysis filters or at the output by using several simultaneously stimulated electrodes per channel. We measured speech reception thresholds in noise as a function of the amount of blurring applied to either all 15 electrode channels or to 5 evenly spaced channels. Performance remained roughly constant as the amount of blurring applied to all channels increased up to some knee point, above which it deteriorated. This knee point differed across listeners in a way that correlated with performance on a non-speech spectro-temporal task, and is proposed here as an individual measure of channel interaction. Surprisingly, even extreme amounts of blurring applied to 5 channels did not affect performance. The effects on speech perception in noise were similar for blurring at the input and at the output of the CI. The results are in line with the assumption that experienced CI users can make use of a limited number of effective channels of information and tolerate some deviations from their everyday settings when identifying speech in the presence of a masker. Furthermore, these findings may explain the mixed results by strategies that optimized or deactivated a small number of electrodes evenly distributed along the array by showing that blurring or deactivating one-third of the electrodes did not harm speech-in-noise performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.