ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
The impact of an in-department pharmacist on the prevention of drug iatrogenesis in a rheumatology department.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical impact of a personalized pharmaceutical plan on opioid management in non-cancer pain: a pilot study.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Trial
- Impact of the Clinical Pharmacist in Rheumatology Practice: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesThe primary objective was to evaluate the impact of an in-department pharmacist on the prevention of drug iatrogenesis in a rheumatology department. Secondary objectives were to determine (i) if medication history discrepancies were detected more frequently in the elderly or not, and (ii) if the mean number of treatments at admission had an impact on the number of medication history discrepancies.
methodsImplementation of a clinical-pharmacy program based on medication reconciliation and medication review of prescription for all patients admitted to a rheumatology department between January and June 2017. The analytical approach was mainly descriptive and data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (i.e., number of treatments at admission, number of medication reconciliations) and as proportions (i.e., acceptance rate, impact). Chi-squared tests and Student's test were performed to determine if there was a significant difference in outcomes.
resultsThree hundred twelve patients were included in the study, 517 medication history discrepancies in 243 (77.8%) patients and 196 pharmaceutical interventions in 133 (42.6%) patients. A significant difference was found in the number of medication history discrepancies and pharmaceutical interventions between the two age groups and in the mean number of treatments at admission between patients with or without medication history discrepancies. 15.4% of study patients had major medication history discrepancies and major pharmaceutical interventions. All patients and practitioners reported the usefulness of an in-department pharmacist.
conclusionThis program was found effective in terms of safety and improvement in the continuity of care. Key Points • This clinical-pharmacy program with an in-department pharmacist had a positive impact on the prevention of drug iatrogenesis in one rheumatology department. • 15.4% (n = 48) of study patients had major medication history discrepancies and major pharmaceutical interventions. • All practitioners and patients were satisfied with this clinical-pharmacy program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.