ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Outcome of pulse oral cyclophosphamide therapy in scleroderma interstitial lung disease.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Prevalence and clinical associations with premature ovarian insufficiency, early menopause, and low ovarian reserve in systemic sclerosis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStandard regimens for scleroderma interstitial lung diseases (SSc-ILDs) are pulse intravenous (IV) and oral daily cyclophosphamide (CYC). However, IV CYC has limited access to diffuse cutaneous SSc, and oral daily CYC is associated with febrile neutropenia and hemorrhagic cystitis. Pulse oral CYC regimen has never been studied.
objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of pulse oral CYC therapy in SSc-ILDs, predictors of effectiveness, and side-effects.
methodsA historical cohort study enrolled SSc-ILDs from the SSc database registry at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand from 1 January 2012 to 1 October 2018. All patients received monthly oral dosages of CYC 600-750 mg/m
resultsA total of 76 patients with female 52 patients (68.4%) and with a median age of 54.2 years (IQR 46.6-59.6). The majority was dcSSc subset (59 patients; 78.6%). Fifty-four patients (71%) were defined as responsive to therapy. The mean FVC improvement was 1 ml (SD 9.5). The only factor associated with treatment response was limited cutaneous SSc (OR 7.69, 95% CI (1.01, 339.68), p = 0.029). Hemorrhagic cystitis was found in 1 patient.
conclusionsNearly three-quarters of SSc-ILDs patients had a good response to the pulse oral CYC therapy for 2 years with a few serious side effects. Pulse oral CYC therapy had been effective for SSc-ILDs in case of difficult IV access. Key Point • Pulse oral cyclophosphamide has been used for scleroderma lung disease. It has shown efficacy and safety in scleroderma patients. In patients who have difficulty with intravenous access, pulse oral cyclophosphamide can be an alternative regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.