Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518936›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2020

The yield of pap smears and its characteristics in a community based setting in Saudi Arabia.

Fay A AlBabtain, Aneela N Hussain, Suad A Alsoghayer, Omar A Alwahbi, Nawaf Almohaisen, Abdullah H Alkhenizan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fay A AlBabtainDepartment of Family Medicine & Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail. fayalbabtain@gmail.com.
Aneela N Hussain
Suad A Alsoghayer
Omar A Alwahbi
Nawaf Almohaisen
Abdullah H Alkhenizan
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the yield of Papanicolaou tests (pap smears), including the characteristics of abnormal pap smears. Methods: In this record-based cross-sectional study, we reviewed pap smears of patients seen at the Family Medicine clinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center from January 2002 to January 2017. All women between the ages of 21 and 65 were included. Study-specific case report form was developed to capture patient demographics, pap smear histopathology (Bethesda III System), human papilloma virus polymerase chain reaction (HPV PCR), and the parity status. Results: A total of 3346 patients were included; 2.2% had abnormal pap smear. Most frequent abnormalities were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (2%), followed by glandular cell abnormalities (0.8%). Human papilloma virus infection was detected in 6.5% and all other infections were identified in 9.2% of all screened Pap smears. Conclusion: Pap smears remain an effective tool for cervical cancer screening. Low yields of pap smears compared to other developed countries could be attributed to lower risk factors for cervical cancer in Saudi Arabia. Routine screening especially among high risk women is strongly recommended.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPrimary Health CareSaudi ArabiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32518936
PMCPMC7502935
OpenAlexW3033972553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.