ArticleSaudi medical journal2020
Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using the screening algorithm WINROP in a Saudi cohort of preterm infants.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Postnatal Weight Gain Algorithms to Predict Severe or Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence of retinopathy of prematurity in African preterm infants and evaluation of the accuracy of the WINROP predictive algorithm: an observational clinical study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Validation of DIGIROP- Birth and DIGIROP- Screen for the discovery of retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment in preterm births in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Validation of WINROP algorithm as screening tool of retinopathy of prematurity among Egyptian preterm neonates.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Retinopathy of Prematurity-Targeting Hypoxic and Redox Signaling Pathways.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- ASSESSMENT OF NEONATAL CARE STANDARD BY THE PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY BASED ON WEIGHT GAIN.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Article
- Jeddah Retinopathy of Prematurity (JED-ROP) Screening Algorithm.Global pediatric health · 2023Article
- Comment on: Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using the screening algorithm WINROP in a Saudi cohort of preterm infants.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
- Comment on: Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using the screening algorithm WINROP in a Saudi cohort of preterm infants.Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo validate the web weight gain-based WINROP (weight, insulin-like growth factor I, neonatal, retinopathy of prematurity [ROP]) algorithm retrospectively to identify type 1 ROP in a Saudi cohort of premature infants. Methods: The records of preterm infants (greater than 23 and less than 32 weeks gestation) born between August 2013 and October 2018, were reviewed. Birth weight, gestational age, and weekly weight measurements of the premature infants were entered online. Based on weekly weight gain, the WINROP algorithm alerted clinicians whether infants were at high-risk for vision‑threatening type 1 ROP. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Results: The median gestational age of the infants at birth was 28 weeks, with median birth weight at 1085 g. Of the 175 infants included in the study, 13 (7.4%) developed type 1 ROP. WINROP positive alarm was triggered in 70.9% (124/175) of all infants and 100% (13/13) of those treated for type 1 ROP. The specificity of the algorithm was 31.5%. Positive predictive values was 10.5% and negative was 100%. Conclusion: The general WINROP sensitivity in identifying type 1 ROP was 100% similar to that reported in developed countries; however, its specificity was low at 31.5%. Tweaking of the algorithm based on the population may increase the specificity and promote the practical utility of this non-invasive screening tool for ophthalmologists and neonatologists in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.