ArticleTherapeutic advances in reproductive health
Patient perspectives and experiences with
Article in Therapeutic advances in reproductive health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supporting Women Undergoing IVF Treatment With Timely Patient Information Through an App: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
- Thematic analysis of a United Kingdom-wide survey to explore women's perceptions and concerns about assisted reproductive technology.Human fertility (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Factors Contributing to Uptake of Stillbirth Evaluations: A Qualitative Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Opportunities to optimize patient experience in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic and the role of genetic counselors.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Challenges experienced by genetic counselors while they provided counseling about mosaic embryos.F&S reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Creating a postmortem examination decision aid: Suggestions from bereaved parents of a stillborn.Patient education and counseling · 2023Article
- Understanding the experiences and perspectives of prenatal screening among a diverse cohort.Prenatal diagnosis · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, treatment and disclosure: A qualitative exploration of participant challenges in a Monogenic Diabetes Registry.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Lived experiences of patients with placenta accreta spectrum in Utah: a qualitative study of semi-structured interviews.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDecision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during
methodsInterviews (
resultsCategories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman's contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during
conclusionThe emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.