Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518773›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2020

Keystone design perforator island flap in facial defect reconstruction.

Soo Yeon Lim, Chi Sun Yoon, Hyun Gun Lee, Kyu Nam Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Keystone Flap for Vulvar Reconstruction: A Case Series and BODY-Q Evaluation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Keystone Design Perforator Flap: A Flap to Simplify Complex Reconstructive Issues.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soo Yeon LimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center, Daejeon 35365, South Korea.
Chi Sun YoonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan 54538, South Korea.
Hyun Gun LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center, Daejeon 35365, South Korea.
Kyu Nam KimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, University of Konyang College of Medicine, Myunggok Medical Research Center, Daejeon 35365, South Korea. manabear77@naver.com.
Konyang University · KRWonkwang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facial defect coverage is a common subject in the field of reconstructive surgery. There are many methods for facial defect reconstruction, and reconstructive surgeons should choose the most appropriate method on a case-by-case basis to achieve both functional and aesthetic improvement. Among various options for facial reconstruction, the local flap technique is considered the best reconstructive modality to provide good tissue matches of color and texture, which is consistent with the ideal goal of reconstruction (replacement of like-with-like). Keystone design perforator island flap (KDPIF), devised by Behan in 2003, has been applied to various fields of reconstructive surgery in the past decade due to its design simplicity, robust vascular supply, and reproducibility. Several studies have reported KDPIF reconstruction of facial defects, such as large parotid defects, small-to-moderate nasal defects, and eyelid defects. However, KDPIF has been used relatively less in facial defects than in other body regions, such as the trunk and extremities. The purpose of this review is to provide an organized overview of facial KDPIF reconstruction including the classification of KDPIF, modifications, physiology, mechanism of flap movement, consideration of facial relaxed skin tension lines and aesthetics, surgical techniques, clinical applications, and precautions for successful execution of KDPIF reconstruction.

Indexed as

AestheticsFacial defectsFlap surgeryKeystone design perforator island flapPlastic surgeryReconstructive surgery

Identifiers

PMID32518773
PMCPMC7262693
OpenAlexW3031722042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.