Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518718›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Microbiome analysis of healthy and diseased sponges

Lubov Chernogor, Elizaveta Klimenko, Igor Khanaev, Sergei Belikov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome Analysis of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cooperative Interaction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  15. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lubov Chernogor *Limnological Institute of the SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia.
Elizaveta KlimenkoLimnological Institute of the SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia.
Igor KhanaevLimnological Institute of the SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia.
Sergei Belikov *Limnological Institute of the SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia.
Limnological Institute · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endemic sponges (Demosponges, Lubomirskiidae) dominate the fauna of the littoral zone of Lake Baikal. These freshwater sponges live in symbiosis with diverse eukaryotes and prokaryotes, including chlorophyll-containing microalgae. Within the last 5 years, the incidence of sponge disease and mortality events in Lake Baikal has increased. The etiology and ecology of these events remain unknown, in part because of the lack of models to study sponge-microbe interactions. In this work, we tested the use of primmorph cell cultures of

Indexed as

Lubomirskia baikcalensisOpportunistic pathogenPrimmorphsSymbionts

Identifiers

PMID32518718
PMCPMC7258933
OpenAlexW2959649967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.