Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518663›Full record

ReviewAsthma research and practice2020

Asthma management with breath-triggered inhalers: innovation through design.

Mário Morais-Almeida, Helena Pité, João Cardoso, Rui Costa, Carlos Robalo Cordeiro, Eurico Silva, Ana Todo-Bom, Cláudia Vicente, José Agostinho Marques

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asthma research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mário Morais-Almeida *Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
Helena Pité *Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital and CUF Infante Santo Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
João CardosoPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui CostaFamily Medicine, Porto, Portugal.
Carlos Robalo CordeiroPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Eurico SilvaFamily Medicine USF João Semana, Aveiro, Ovar, Portugal.
Ana Todo-BomImmunoallergology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cláudia VicenteFamily Medicine UCSP Soure, Coimbra, Portugal.
José Agostinho MarquesPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
CUF Porto Hospital · PTHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTHospital de São João · PTNational Statistical Institute of Portugal · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma affects the lives of hundred million people around the World. Despite notable progresses in disease management, asthma control remains largely insufficient worldwide, influencing patients' wellbeing and quality of life. Poor patient handling of inhaling devices has been identified as a major persistent problem that significantly reduces inhaled drugs' efficacy and is associated with poor adherence to treatment, impairing clinical results such as asthma control and increasing disease-related costs. We herein review key research and development (R&D) innovation in inhaler devices, highlighting major real-world critical errors in the handling and inhalation technique with current devices and considering potential solutions. Furthermore, we discuss current evidence regarding breath-triggered inhalers (BTI). MAIN BODY: The two most common significant problems with inhalers are coordinating actuation and inhalation with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), and the need to inhale forcibly with a dry powder inhaler. BTI R&D plans were designed to overcome these problems. Its newest device k-haler® has several other important features, generating a less forceful aerosol plume than previous pMDIs, with efficient drug delivery and lung deposition, even in patients with low inspiratory flow. The local and systemic bioavailability of fluticasone propionate and formoterol (FP/FORM) administered via k-haler® has been shown to be therapeutically equivalent when administered via the previous FP/FORM pMDI. This device requires very few steps and has been considered easy to use (even at first attempt) and preferred by the patients in a randomized crossover study. In our country, FP/FORM k-haler is available without additional costs compared to FP/FORM pMDI. All devices continue to require education and regular checking of the correct inhalation technique.

conclusionBTI R&D can bring advantage over current available inhalers, avoiding the two most common identified critical errors in inhalation technique. K-haler® BTI is currently available, without an increased cost, and approved for adolescents and adults with asthma in whom treatment with inhaled combined therapy with long-acting beta

Indexed as

AsthmaBreath-triggered-inhalersControlInhalersInnovationK-haler

Identifiers

PMID32518663
PMCPMC7275490
OpenAlexW3032968825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.