Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518659›Full record

Observational studyOpen heart2020

CT imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the UK.

Iwan Harries, Jonathan R Weir-McCall, Michelle C Williams, James Shambrook, Giles Roditi, Russel Bull, Gareth J Morgan-Hughes, Edward D Nicol, Alastair J Moss

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Time to Go with the Flow in Coronary Artery Disease in TAVR?Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Iwan HarriesCardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0688-3345
Jonathan R Weir-McCallRadiology, University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-842X
Michelle C WilliamsCentre for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Lothian, UK.
James ShambrookRadiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Giles RoditiRadiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Russel BullRadiology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Gareth J Morgan-HughesCardiology, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Edward D NicolCardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alastair J MossUniversity of Edinburgh Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4123-2070
University of Edinburgh · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBNIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBPlymouth Hospital · GBRoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional observational study sought to describe variations in CT in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (CT-TAVI) as currently performed in the UK. Methods: 408 members of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging were invited to complete a 27-item online CT-TAVI survey. Results: 47 responses (12% response rate) were received from 40 cardiac centres, 23 (58%) of which performed TAVI on-site (TAVI centres). Only six respondents (13%) performed high-volume activity (>200 scans per year) compared with 13 (28%) performing moderate (100-200 scans per year) and 27 (59%) performing low (0-99 scans per year) volume activity. Acquisition protocols varied (41% retrospective, 12% prospective with wide padding, 47% prospective with narrow padding), as did the phase of reporting (45% systolic, 37% diastolic, 11% both, 6% unreported). Median dose length product was 675 mGy.cm (IQR 477-954 mGy.cm). Compared with non-TAVI centres, TAVI centres were more likely to report minimum iliofemoral luminal diameter (n=25, 96% vs n=7, 58%, p=0.003) and optimal tube angulation for intervention (n=12, 46% vs n=1, 8%, p=0.02). Conclusions: This national survey formally describes current CT-TAVI practice in the UK. High-volume activity was only present at one in seven cardiac CT centres. There is wide variation in scan acquisition, scan reporting and radiation dose exposure in cardiac CT centres.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveCross-Sectional StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHeart Valve DiseasesHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Predictive Value of TestsRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureTomography, X-Ray ComputedTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementUnited Kingdomaortic valve diseaseCT scanningpercutaneous valve therapy

Identifiers

PMID32518659
PMCPMC7254150
OpenAlexW3016197777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.