ArticleMovement ecology2020
An application of upscaled optimal foraging theory using hidden Markov modelling: year-round behavioural variation in a large arctic herbivore.
Article in Movement ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Riding out the storm: Behavioural responses of a large herbivore to high-Arctic winds.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
- Hard to handle: infected house finches do not prefer easier-to-consume food.Animal behaviour · 2026Article
- Inferring behavioural states from tracking data with hidden Markov models - a validation study using GPS video-camera collars.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Integrating Temporal and Spatial Dimensions of Alpine Adaptation: Camera-Trap Insights on Bharal (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Seasonal movement behavior of domestic goats in response to environmental variability and time of day using Hidden Markov Models.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Climate Change and Human Pressure: Assessing the Vulnerability of Snow Leopard (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- GPS-Based Hidden Markov Models to Document Pastoral Mobility in the Sahel.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing contemporary Arctic habitat availability for a woolly mammoth proxy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Hidden Markov movement models reveal diverse seasonal movement patterns in two North American ungulates.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Convergent molecular evolution of thermogenesis and circadian rhythm in Arctic ruminants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Quantifying effects of snow depth on caribou winter range selection and movement in Arctic Alaska.Movement ecology · 2021Article
- Environmental conditions alter behavioural organization and rhythmicity of a large Arctic ruminant across the annual cycle.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn highly seasonal environments, animals face critical decisions regarding time allocation, diet optimisation, and habitat use. In the Arctic, the short summers are crucial for replenishing body reserves, while low food availability and increased energetic demands characterise the long winters (9-10 months). Under such extreme seasonal variability, even small deviations from optimal time allocation can markedly impact individuals' condition, reproductive success and survival. We investigated which environmental conditions influenced daily, seasonal, and interannual variation in time allocation in high-arctic muskoxen (
methodsUsing hidden Markov models (HMMs), we inferred behavioural states (foraging, resting, relocating) from hourly positions of GPS-collared females tracked in northeast Greenland (28 muskox-years). To relate behavioural variation to environmental conditions, we considered a wide range of spatially and/or temporally explicit covariates in the HMMs.
resultsWhile we found little interannual variation, daily and seasonal time allocation varied markedly. Scheduling of daily activities was distinct throughout the year except for the period of continuous daylight. During summer, muskoxen spent about 69% of time foraging and 19% resting, without environmental constraints on foraging activity. During winter, time spent foraging decreased to 45%, whereas about 43% of time was spent resting, mediated by longer resting bouts than during summer.
conclusionsOur results clearly indicate that female muskoxen follow an energy intake maximisation strategy during the arctic summer. During winter, our results were not easily reconcilable with just one dominant foraging strategy. The overall reduction in activity likely reflects higher time requirements for rumination in response to the reduction of forage quality (supporting an energy intake maximisation strategy). However, deep snow and low temperatures were apparent constraints to winter foraging, hence also suggesting attempts to conserve energy (net energy maximisation strategy). Our approach provides new insights into the year-round behavioural strategies of the largest Arctic herbivore and outlines a practical example of how to approximate qualitative predictions of upscaled optimal foraging theory using multi-year GPS tracking data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.