Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518653›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2020

An application of upscaled optimal foraging theory using hidden Markov modelling: year-round behavioural variation in a large arctic herbivore.

Larissa T Beumer, Jennifer Pohle, Niels M Schmidt, Marianna Chimienti, Jean-Pierre Desforges, Lars H Hansen, Roland Langrock, Stine Højlund Pedersen, Mikkel Stelvig, Floris M van Beest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Larissa T BeumerDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5255-1889
Jennifer PohleDepartment of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-3030
Niels M SchmidtDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4166-6218
Marianna ChimientiDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8236-9332
Jean-Pierre DesforgesDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-7697
Lars H HansenDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2956-7388
Roland LangrockDepartment of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Stine Højlund PedersenCooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA.
Mikkel StelvigCopenhagen Zoo, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2272-7492
Floris M van BeestDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5701-4927
Aarhus University · DKBielefeld University · DECopenhagen Zoo · DKUniversity of Alaska Anchorage · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn highly seasonal environments, animals face critical decisions regarding time allocation, diet optimisation, and habitat use. In the Arctic, the short summers are crucial for replenishing body reserves, while low food availability and increased energetic demands characterise the long winters (9-10 months). Under such extreme seasonal variability, even small deviations from optimal time allocation can markedly impact individuals' condition, reproductive success and survival. We investigated which environmental conditions influenced daily, seasonal, and interannual variation in time allocation in high-arctic muskoxen (

methodsUsing hidden Markov models (HMMs), we inferred behavioural states (foraging, resting, relocating) from hourly positions of GPS-collared females tracked in northeast Greenland (28 muskox-years). To relate behavioural variation to environmental conditions, we considered a wide range of spatially and/or temporally explicit covariates in the HMMs.

resultsWhile we found little interannual variation, daily and seasonal time allocation varied markedly. Scheduling of daily activities was distinct throughout the year except for the period of continuous daylight. During summer, muskoxen spent about 69% of time foraging and 19% resting, without environmental constraints on foraging activity. During winter, time spent foraging decreased to 45%, whereas about 43% of time was spent resting, mediated by longer resting bouts than during summer.

conclusionsOur results clearly indicate that female muskoxen follow an energy intake maximisation strategy during the arctic summer. During winter, our results were not easily reconcilable with just one dominant foraging strategy. The overall reduction in activity likely reflects higher time requirements for rumination in response to the reduction of forage quality (supporting an energy intake maximisation strategy). However, deep snow and low temperatures were apparent constraints to winter foraging, hence also suggesting attempts to conserve energy (net energy maximisation strategy). Our approach provides new insights into the year-round behavioural strategies of the largest Arctic herbivore and outlines a practical example of how to approximate qualitative predictions of upscaled optimal foraging theory using multi-year GPS tracking data.

Indexed as

Activity budgetsArctic ungulateBehavioural state classificationHidden Markov modellingOptimal foraging theorySeasonality

Identifiers

PMID32518653
PMCPMC7275509
OpenAlexW3033748737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.