Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518583›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2020

Comparison of three

Fang Liu, Pandi Wang, Xiaojuan Xiong, Ping Fu, Hongfei Gao, Xinhua Ding, Gang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficient and versatile rapeseed transformation for new breeding technologies.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Methylglyoxal-glyoxalase system as a possible selection module for raising marker-safe plants in rice.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang Liu *Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Pandi Wang *Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xiaojuan XiongKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Ping FuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Hongfei GaoKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Xinhua DingState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, 271018 Shandong China.
Gang WuKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-0382
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneration of marker-free transgenic plants is very important to the regulatory permission and commercial release of transgenic crops. Co-transformation methods that enable the removal of selectable marker genes have been extensively used because they are simple and clean. Few comparisons are currently available between different strain/plasmid co-transformation systems, and also data are related to variation in co-transformation frequencies caused by other details of the vector design.

resultsIn this study, we constructed three vector systems for the co-transformation of allotetraploid

conclusionWe were successful in removing selectable marker genes in transgenic

Indexed as

Brassica napusCo-transformation“Double T-DNA” vector systemHerbicide resistantMarker-freeMixed-strain system

Identifiers

PMID32518583
PMCPMC7275470
OpenAlexW3032943402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.