Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518557›Full record

ArticleThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases2020

Energetic supplementation for maintenance or development of

Gabriela Pinto de Oliveira, Samir Moura Kadri, Bruno Giovane Emilio Benaglia, Paulo Eduardo Martins Ribolla, Ricardo de Oliveira Orsi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Inhibitory activities of propolis, nisin, melittin and essential oil compounds onThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriela Pinto de OliveiraCenter for Education, Science and Technology in Rational Beekeeping (NECTAR), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Samir Moura KadriCenter for Education, Science and Technology in Rational Beekeeping (NECTAR), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Giovane Emilio BenagliaCenter for Education, Science and Technology in Rational Beekeeping (NECTAR), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Eduardo Martins RibollaDepartment of Parasitology, Botucatu Biosciences Institute (IBB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo de Oliveira OrsiCenter for Education, Science and Technology in Rational Beekeeping (NECTAR), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-8277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nutritional requirements of honeybees (

methodsTwenty

resultsThe results showed that the supplementation of colonies with sugar syrup resulted in an intermediate consumption level (894.6 ± 291 mL) and better development (384.9 ± 237.3 and 158.3 ± 171.6 cm

conclusionsTherefore, sugar syrup is concluded to be the best artificial energetic food for use in the supplementation of honeybee colonies.

Indexed as

Apis melliferaBeekeepingEnergetic foodsGene expressionNutritional stress

Identifiers

PMID32518557
PMCPMC7250130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.