Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518379›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Vis/NIR hyperspectral imaging distinguishes sub-population, production environment, and physicochemical grain properties in rice.

Jinyoung Y Barnaby, Trevis D Huggins, Hoonsoo Lee, Anna M McClung, Shannon R M Pinson, Mirae Oh, Gary R Bauchan, Lee Tarpley, Kangjin Lee, Moon S Kim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantification of Photosynthetic Pigments inPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. RiceFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jinyoung Y Barnaby *Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR, 72160, USA.
Trevis D Huggins *Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR, 72160, USA.
Hoonsoo LeeEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Anna M McClungDale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR, 72160, USA.
Shannon R M PinsonDale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR, 72160, USA.
Mirae OhEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Gary R BauchanElectron & Confocal Microscopy Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Lee TarpleyTexas A&M AgriLife Research Center, Texas A&M University System, Beaumont, TX, 77713, USA.
Kangjin LeeNational Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Haman, 52054, Republic of Korea.
Moon S KimEnvironmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
Jeremy D EdwardsDale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service, Stuttgart, AR, 72160, USA. Jeremy.Edwards@usda.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice grain quality is a multifaceted quantitative trait that impacts crop value and is influenced by multiple genetic and environmental factors. Chemical, physical, and visual analyses are the standard methods for measuring grain quality. In this study, we evaluated high-throughput hyperspectral imaging for quantification of rice grain quality and classification of grain samples by genetic sub-population and production environment. Whole grain rice samples from the USDA mini-core collection grown in multiple locations were evaluated using hyperspectral imaging and compared with results from standard phenotyping. Loci associated with hyperspectral values were mapped in the mini-core with 3.2 million SNPs in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Our results show that visible and near infra-red (Vis/NIR) spectroscopy can classify rice according to sub-population and production environment based on differences in physicochemical grain properties. The 702-900 nm range of the NIR spectrum was associated with the chalky grain trait. GWAS revealed that grain chalk and hyperspectral variation share genomic regions containing several plausible candidate genes for grain chalkiness. Hyperspectral quantification of grain chalk was validated using a segregating bi-parental mapping population. These results indicate that Vis/NIR can be used for non-destructive high throughput phenotyping of grain chalk and potentially other grain quality properties.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHyperspectral ImagingOryzaPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Grains

Identifiers

PMID32518379
PMCPMC7283329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.