Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518258›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

CYCLIN-B1/2 and -D1 act in opposition to coordinate cortical progenitor self-renewal and lineage commitment.

Daniel W Hagey, Danijal Topcic, Nigel Kee, Florie Reynaud, Maria Bergsland, Thomas Perlmann, Jonas Muhr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cytoplasmic cyclin D1 modulates brain cortex development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell cycle-dependent cues regulate temporal patterning of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cancer takes many paths through G1/S.Trends in cell biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Control of GThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel W Hagey *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden. daniel.hagey@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6235
Danijal Topcic *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nigel KeeDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Florie ReynaudDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria BergslandDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas PerlmannDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jonas MuhrDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, SE-171 65, Stockholm, Sweden. jonas.muhr@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-0788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sequential generation of layer-specific cortical neurons requires radial glia cells (RGCs) to precisely balance self-renewal and lineage commitment. While specific cell-cycle phases have been associated with these decisions, the mechanisms linking the cell-cycle machinery to cell-fate commitment remain obscure. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing, we find that the strongest transcriptional signature defining multipotent RGCs is that of G2/M-phase, and particularly CYCLIN-B1/2, while lineage-committed progenitors are enriched in G1/S-phase genes, including CYCLIN-D1. These data also reveal cell-surface markers that allow us to isolate RGCs and lineage-committed progenitors, and functionally confirm the relationship between cell-cycle phase enrichment and cell fate competence. Finally, we use cortical electroporation to demonstrate that CYCLIN-B1/2 cooperate with CDK1 to maintain uncommitted RGCs by activating the NOTCH pathway, and that CYCLIN-D1 promotes differentiation. Thus, this work establishes that cell-cycle phase-specific regulators act in opposition to coordinate the self-renewal and lineage commitment of RGCs via core stem cell regulatory pathways.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell SeparationCerebral CortexCyclin B1Cyclin B2Cyclin D1FemaleFlow CytometryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeurogliaCcnb1 protein, mouseCcnb2 protein, mouseCcnd1 protein, mouseCDC2 Protein KinaseCdk1 protein, mouseCyclin B1Cyclin B2Cyclin D1

Identifiers

PMID32518258
PMCPMC7283355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.