Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32518248›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2020

Assessing similarities and disparities in the skin microbiota between wild and laboratory populations of house mice.

Meriem Belheouane, Marie Vallier, Aleksa Čepić, Cecilia J Chung, Saleh Ibrahim, John F Baines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of Athymic Nude Mouse Stock and Colony Source on the Severity of Corynebacterium-Associated Hyperkeratosis.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Commensal skin bacteria exacerbate inflammation and delay skin healing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Virulence Mechanisms of Staphylococcal Animal Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meriem BelheouaneMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Marie VallierMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306, Plön, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-7070
Aleksa ČepićMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Cecilia J ChungMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Saleh IbrahimLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
John F BainesMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306, Plön, Germany. baines@evolbio.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-8426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The house mouse is a key model organism in skin research including host-microbiota interactions, yet little is known about the skin microbiota of free-living mice. It is similarly unclear how closely laboratory mice, which typically live under exceptionally hygienic conditions, resemble the ancestral state of microbial variation in the wild. In this study, we sampled an area spanning 270 km

Indexed as

LaboratoriesMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaFranceMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32518248
PMCPMC7490391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.