Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517970›Full record

ArticleRadiography (London, England : 1995)2021

Initial data from an experiment to implement a safe procedure to perform PA erect chest radiographs for COVID-19 patients with a mobile radiographic system in a "clean" zone of the hospital ward.

L H Sng, L Arlany, L C Toh, T Y Loo, N S Ilzam, B S S Wong, L Lanca

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiography (London, England : 1995), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L H SngSengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore; Singapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Drive, 138683, Singapore. Electronic address: sng.li.hoon@gmail.com.
L ArlanySengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore.
L C TohSengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore.
T Y LooSengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore.
N S IlzamSengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore.
B S S WongSengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, 544886, Singapore.
L LancaSingapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Drive, 138683, Singapore.
Sengkang General Hospital · SGSingapore Institute of Technology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the current Covid-19 pandemic, general wards have been converted into cohort wards for Covid-19 patients who are stable and ambulant. A 2-radiographer mobile radiography team is required to perform bedside Chest X-rays (CXR) for these patients. Hospital guidelines require both radiographers to be in full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) throughout the image acquisition process and the mobile radiographic unit needs to be disinfected twice after each case. This affects the efficiency of the procedure and an increase usage of limited PPE resources. This study aims to explore the feasibility of performing mobile chest radiography with the mobile radiographic unit in a "clean" zone of the hospital ward.

methodsAn anthropomorphic body phantom was used during the test. With the mobile radiographic unit placed in a "clean" zone, the phantom and the mobile radiographic unit was segregated by the room door with a clear glass panel. The test was carried out with the room door open and closed. Integrated radiation level and patient dose were measured. A consultant radiologist was invited to review and score all the images acquired using a Barco Medical Grade workstation. The Absolute Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) scoring system was used to score these images.

resultsA VGA score of 4 was given to all the 40 test images, suggesting that there is no significant differences in the image quality of the images acquired using the 2 different methods. Radiation exposure received by the patient at the highest kV setting through the glass is comparable to the regular CXR on patient without glass panel at 90 kV, suggesting that there is no significant increase in patient dose.

conclusionThe result suggests that acquiring CXR with the X-ray beam attenuating through a glass panel is a safe and feasible way of performing CXR for COVID-19 patients in the newly converted COVID wards. This will allow the mobile radiographic unit as well as one radiographer to be completely segregated from the patient. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This new method of acquiring CXR in an isolation facility set up requires a 2-Radiographer mobile radiography team, and is applicable only for patients who are generally well and not presented with any mobility issues. It is also important to note that a clear glass panel must be present in the barriers set up for segregation between the "clean" zone and patient zone in order to use this new method of acquiring CXR.

Indexed as

COVID-19Feasibility StudiesHumansPatients' RoomsPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRadiography, ThoracicRadiology Department, HospitalChest X-rayCOVID-19Mobile RadiographyPortable

Identifiers

PMID32517970
PMCPMC7261440
OpenAlexW3028877282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.