Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517771›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Milk-borne bacterial health hazards in milk produced for commercial purpose in Tigray, northern Ethiopia.

Gebretsadik Berhe, Araya Gebreyesus Wasihun, Enquebaher Kassaye, Kibrom Gebreselasie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunoassay-mass spectrometry to identifyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Kinship analysis ofVeterinary world · 2024
    Article
  12. Hygienic Practices of Vendors and Their Contribution to Coliform,International journal of food science · 2024
    Article
  13. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase ProducingVeterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heat-resistant and biofilm-forming Escherichia coli in pasteurized milk from Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gebretsadik BerheCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia. gebretsadik_b@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-1383
Araya Gebreyesus WasihunCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Enquebaher KassayeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Kibrom GebreselasieCollege of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Mekelle University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMilk being a suitable medium for bacterial growth, it can serve as a source of bacterial contamination. Pathogenic bacteria in milk pose a serious health threat to humans and constitute about 90% of all dairy-related diseases. However, there are few studies that examined the health hazards of raw milk consumption in Ethiopia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of bacterial contamination and associated factors in milk produced for commercial purpose in Tigray region, northern Ethiopia.

methodsThis study used a cross-sectional study design, selected 315 persons (168 cafeterias, 96 dairy farms, and 51 milk vendors) for interview and collected the same number of bulk raw milk samples using systematic sampling procedure. Data were collected on socio-demographic, farm hygiene and milk handling practices by trained health professionals. Bacterial contamination was defined as total bacterial count (TBC) > 1 × 10

resultsFrom the 315 milk samples tested, the prevalence of bacterial contamination was 52% (95% CI: 46.5-57.6). The mean counts of contaminated samples of TBC, SC, and CC were 8.94 ± 0.46 Standard Deviation (SD), 8.52 ± 0.6 SD, and 8.78 ± 0.49 SD log CFU/ml, respectively. The proportion of contamination was significantly lower in milk collected from dairy farms (32/96, 33.3, 95% CI: 24.5-43.2) compared to milk from vendors (33/51, 64.7, 95% CI: 51.4-66.2) and cafeterias (99/168, 58.9, 95% CI, 50.9-76.85). The milk samples were culture-positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, K. oxytoca and Citrobacter freundii.

conclusionsOver half of the sampled raw milk exhibited bacterial contamination with increasing trend from farmers to points of sale. Thus, milk vendors and cafeteria owners should apply good hygienic and sanitation practices during handling of milk; use appropriate, clean containers, and cold chain during milk transportation; and refrigeration of milk during storage.

Indexed as

CommerceFood SafetyFood SupplyAnimalsBacteriaCitrobacter freundiiCross-Sectional StudiesDairyingEscherichia coliEthiopiaFarmsFoodborne DiseasesFood MicrobiologyGram-Negative BacteriaHumansHygieneBacteriaCommercialHealth-hazardsMilk-borneTigray

Identifiers

PMID32517771
PMCPMC7285727
OpenAlexW3032955878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.