Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517745›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Pharmacy students' perspectives on the initial implementation of a teaching electronic medical record: results from a mixed-methods assessment.

Olga O Vlashyn, Omolola A Adeoye-Olatunde, Kimberly S Illingworth Plake, Jamie L Woodyard, Zachary A Weber, Alissa L Russ-Jara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy education: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. EMR Precharting Efficiency in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga O VlashynPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Omolola A Adeoye-OlatundePurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Kimberly S Illingworth PlakePurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Jamie L WoodyardPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Zachary A WeberPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Alissa L Russ-JaraPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 575 W. Stadium Ave, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. alissajara@purdue.edu.

Funding

Purdue University Gloria Niemeyer Francke Research Award, Purdue University, Pharmacy Practice Advancement Grant Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic medical records (EMRs) have been used for nearly three decades. Pharmacists use EMRs on a daily basis, but EMRs have only recently been incorporated into pharmacy education. Some pharmacy programs have implemented teaching electronic medical records (tEMRs), but best practices for incorporating tEMRs into pharmacy education remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to 1) assess pharmacy students' views and experiences with a tEMR; and 2) identify current learning activities and future priorities for tEMR use in pharmacy education.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach, including three, two-hour student focus groups and a 42-item web-based survey to examine student perspectives of the tEMR. All first, second, and third year professional pharmacy students were eligible to participate in the survey and a focus group. Web-based survey items were measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics. Two researchers independently coded transcripts using both deductive and inductive approaches to identify emergent themes. These analysts met and resolved any coding discrepancies via consensus.

resultsFocus groups were conducted with 22 total students, with 6-8 students represented from each year of pharmacy training. The survey was completed by 156 students: 47 first year, 55 second year, and 54 third year. Overall, 48.7% of survey respondents altogether agreed or strongly agreed that using the tEMR enhanced their learning in pharmacy classes and laboratories. Qualitative data were organized into four major themes regarding tEMR adoption: current priorities for use within the pharmacy curriculum; tEMR benefits; tEMR barriers; and future priorities for tEMR use to prepare students for pharmacy practice.

conclusionsThis study reveals pharmacy students' perspectives and attitudes towards using a tEMR, the types of classroom activities that incorporate the tEMR, and students' future suggestions to enhance the design or application of the tEMR for their learning. Our research findings may aid other pharmacy programs and promote more effective use of tEMRs in pharmacy education. In the long-term, this study may strengthen pharmacy education on EMRs and thus increase the efficacy and safety of pharmacists' EMR use for patients' medication management.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsStudents, PharmacyAdolescentAdultEducation, PharmacyFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultEducationElectronic health recordsFocus groupsPharmacyStudentsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32517745
PMCPMC7285515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.