Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517697›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Amino acid encoding for deep learning applications.

Hesham ElAbd, Yana Bromberg, Adrienne Hoarfrost, Tobias Lenz, Andre Franke, Mareike Wendorff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial intelligence catalyzes antimicrobial peptide design.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biomolecular Interaction Prediction: The Era of AI.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hesham ElAbdInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Yana BrombergDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Adrienne HoarfrostDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Tobias LenzResearch Group for Evolutionary Immunogenomics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306, Plön, Germany.
Andre FrankeInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany. a.franke@mucosa.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-5811
Mareike WendorffInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DERutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) Research Training Group 1743, 'Genes, Environment and InflammationDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) Research Training Group 1743, 'Genes, Environment and Inflammation'NASA 80NSSC18M0093NASA Astrobiology Institute NASA Astrobiology Postdoctoral Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of applications of deep learning algorithms in bioinformatics is increasing as they usually achieve superior performance over classical approaches, especially, when bigger training datasets are available. In deep learning applications, discrete data, e.g. words or n-grams in language, or amino acids or nucleotides in bioinformatics, are generally represented as a continuous vector through an embedding matrix. Recently, learning this embedding matrix directly from the data as part of the continuous iteration of the model to optimize the target prediction - a process called 'end-to-end learning' - has led to state-of-the-art results in many fields. Although usage of embeddings is well described in the bioinformatics literature, the potential of end-to-end learning for single amino acids, as compared to more classical manually-curated encoding strategies, has not been systematically addressed. To this end, we compared classical encoding matrices, namely one-hot, VHSE8 and BLOSUM62, to end-to-end learning of amino acid embeddings for two different prediction tasks using three widely used architectures, namely recurrent neural networks (RNN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and the hybrid CNN-RNN.

resultsBy using different deep learning architectures, we show that end-to-end learning is on par with classical encodings for embeddings of the same dimension even when limited training data is available, and might allow for a reduction in the embedding dimension without performance loss, which is critical when deploying the models to devices with limited computational capacities. We found that the embedding dimension is a major factor in controlling the model performance. Surprisingly, we observed that deep learning models are capable of learning from random vectors of appropriate dimension.

conclusionOur study shows that end-to-end learning is a flexible and powerful method for amino acid encoding. Further, due to the flexibility of deep learning systems, amino acid encoding schemes should be benchmarked against random vectors of the same dimension to disentangle the information content provided by the encoding scheme from the distinguishability effect provided by the scheme.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansAmino AcidsAmino acid encodingAmino acids embeddingConvoluted-neural network (CNN)Deep-learningHLA-II peptide interactionHuman-leukocyte antigen (HLA)Machine-learning (ML)Protein-protein interaction (PPI)Recurrent neural network (RNN)

Identifiers

PMID32517697
PMCPMC7285590
OpenAlexW3033814770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.