Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517692›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2020

Bisphenol A shapes children's brain and behavior: towards an integrated neurotoxicity assessment including human data.

Vicente Mustieles, Mariana F Fernández

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational Construction of Toxicant Signaling Networks.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Chemical Exposure-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity in Head-Regenerating Schmidtea mediterranea.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Biomonitoring of Phthalates, Bisphenols and Parabens in Children: Exposure, Predictors and Risk Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vicente MustielesUniversity of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain.
Mariana F FernándezUniversity of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain. marieta@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-8914
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme HBM4EU (#733032)Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS-PI16/01812Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS-PI16/01820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about the effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on human brain and behavior are not novel; however, Grohs and colleagues have contributed groundbreaking data on this topic in a recent issue of Environmental Health. For the first time, associations were reported between prenatal BPA exposure and differences in children's brain microstructure, which appeared to mediate the association between this exposure and children's behavioral symptoms. Findings in numerous previous mother-child cohorts have pointed in a similar worrying direction, linking higher BPA exposure during pregnancy to more behavioral problems throughout childhood as assessed by neuropsychological questionnaires. Notwithstanding, this body of work has not been adequately considered in risk assessment. From a toxicological perspective, results are now available from the CLARITY-BPA consortium, designed to reconcile academic and regulatory toxicology findings. In fact, the brain has consistently emerged as one of the most sensitive organs disrupted by BPA, even at doses below those considered safe by regulatory agencies such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In this Commentary, we contextualize the results of Grohs et al. within the setting of previous epidemiologic and CLARITY-BPA data and express our disquiet about the "all-or-nothing" criterion adopted to select human data in a recent EFSA report on the appraisal methodology for their upcoming BPA risk assessment. We discuss the most relevant human studies, identify emerging patterns, and highlight the need for adequate assessment and interpretation of the increasing epidemiologic literature in this field in order to support decision-making. With the aim of avoiding a myopic or biased selection of a few studies in traditional risk assessment procedures, we propose a future reevaluation of BPA focused on neurotoxicity and based on a systematic and comprehensive integration of available mechanistic, animal, and human data. Taken together, the experimental and epidemiologic evidence converge in the same direction: BPA is a probable developmental neurotoxicant at low doses. Accordingly, the precautionary principle should be followed, progressively implementing stringent preventive policies worldwide, including the banning of BPA in food contact materials and thermal receipts, with a focus on the utilization of safer substitutes.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsPhenolsAnimalsBisphenol A CompoundsBrainChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsPhenolsBehaviorBisphenolBPABrainCLARITY-BPAEndocrine disruptorHBM4EUHealth policyNeurodevelopmentRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32517692
PMCPMC7285610
OpenAlexW3033692813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.