Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517438›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2020

Endometrial "Scratching" An update and overview of current research.

Veronika Günther, Sören von Otte, Nicolai Maass, Ibrahim Alkatout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronika GüntherClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKSH Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-1315
Sören von OtteUniversity Fertility Center, Ambulanzzentrum des UKSH gGmbH, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-9767
Nicolai MaassClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKSH Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-4676
Ibrahim AlkatoutClinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKSH Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About one in every six couples is affected by sterility. Assisted reproduction procedures are currently the treatment of choice for a number of patients who desire children. Many causes of sterility can be overcome with the aid of in vitro fertilization, but successful implantation of the embryos is the major limiting factor. Failure of implantation may occur repetitively. In the treatment of sterility, many approaches have been used to overcome the barrier of implantation failure and improve the chances of successful nidation. Scratching the endometrium prior to embryo transfer has been suggested as one means of enhancing the likelihood of implantation. The current literature was examined to investigate if there was any possible benefit from endometrial scratching. The studies were divided according to whether the women suffered from recurrent implantation failure or not. In summary, it was found that unselected subfertile women generally benefit less from endometrial scratching, but scratching appears to be successful in women who have experienced repeated implantation failure. Although the heterogeneous body of data on the subject deserves further clarification. The latest data presented at "European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology" 2018 in Barcelona suggested that the method should be abandoned.

Indexed as

Infertilityperinatal immunology and inflammationreproductive immunology

Identifiers

PMID32517438
PMCPMC7294834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.