CD9 Is a Very Helpful Marker for Discriminating AML-M3 from HLA-DR-Negative Non-M3 AML

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Rapid and accurate identification of acute promyelocytic leukemia with a novel multiparametric flow cytometric scoring system.Haematologica · 2026
   Article
2. CD9, a tetraspanin in cancer: biology and therapeutic promise in acute leukemia.Oncogenesis · 2025
   Review
3. Comment: In Response to "CD9 Is a Very Helpful Marker for Discriminating AML-M3 from HLA-DR-Negative Non-M3 AML"Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Comment: In Response to "CD9 Is a Very Helpful Marker for Discriminating AML-M3 from HLA-DR-Negative Non-M3 AML"2020

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as