Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517369›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

c-Src and EGFR Inhibition in Molecular Cancer Therapy: What Else Can We Improve?

Stefania Belli, Daniela Esposito, Alberto Servetto, Ada Pesapane, Luigi Formisano, Roberto Bianco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Relationship betweenWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Logic-based mechanistic machine learning on high-content images reveals how drugs differentially regulate cardiac fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefania BelliDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8348-3313
Daniela EspositoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-9861
Alberto ServettoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ada PesapaneDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Luigi FormisanoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-5105
Roberto BiancoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG2018 grant number 21339Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro MFAG2018 grant number 21505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proto-oncogene c-Src is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase playing a key role in many cellular pathways, including cell survival, migration and proliferation. c-Src de-regulation has been observed in several cancer types, making it an appealing target for drug discovery efforts. Recent evidence emphasizes its crucial role not only in promoting oncogenic traits, but also in the acquisition and maintenance of cancer resistance to various chemotherapeutic or molecular target drugs. c-Src modulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation and amplifies its downstream oncogenic signals. In this review, we report several studies supporting c-Src kinase role in the intricate mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We further highlighted pre- and clinical progresses of combined treatment strategies made in recent years. Several pre-clinical data have encouraged the use of c-Src inhibitors in combination with EGFR inhibitors. However, clinical trials provided controversial outcomes in some cancer types. Despite c-Src inhibitors showed good tolerability in cancer patients, no incontrovertible and consistent clinical responses were recorded, supporting the idea that a better selection of patients is needed to improve clinical outcome. Currently, the identification of biological markers predictive of therapy response and the accurate molecular screening of cancer patients aimed to gain most clinical benefits become decisive and mandatory.

Indexed as

c-Src inhibitorsdrug resistanceEGFREGFR-TKIsSrc kinase family

Identifiers

PMID32517369
PMCPMC7352780
OpenAlexW3033712668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.