Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517358›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

GABA

Xingkai Zhao, Guangjun Chang, Yan Cheng, Zhenlei Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingkai Zhao
Guangjun Chang
Yan ChengDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Zhenlei ZhouDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFD0502205National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants31572579 and 31702301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Emulsified isoflurane (EISO) is a type of intravenous anesthetic. How emulsified isoflurane works in the brain is still unclear. The aim of this study was to explore whether epigenetic mechanisms affect anesthesia and to evaluate the anesthetic effects of emulsified isoflurane in rats. (2) Methods: Rats were randomly divided into four groups (

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnesthesiaAnesthetics, InhalationAnimalsDNA MethylationEmulsionsEpigenesis, GeneticIsofluraneParietal LobeProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Non-ReceptorRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, GABA-ARNA, MessengerAnesthetics, InhalationEmulsionsIsofluraneProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Non-ReceptorPtpn5 protein, ratReceptors, GABA-ARNA, MessengerDNA methylationemulsified isoflurane (EISO)epigeneticgeneral anesthesiaion channel protein

Identifiers

PMID32517358
PMCPMC7312199
OpenAlexW3033106094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.