Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517251›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2020

Public Perceptions of Veterinarians from Social and Online Media Listening.

Nicole Widmar, Courtney Bir, John Lai, Christopher Wolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Best Practices for Supporting Professional Identity Formation during Laboratory Animal Medicine Residency Training.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole WidmarDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-5295
Courtney BirDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0862-8241
John LaiFood and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Christopher WolfCharles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Cornell University · USOklahoma State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

American Veterinary Medicine Association 00083930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The public perception of the veterinary medicine profession is of increasing concern given the mounting challenges facing the industry, ranging from student debt loads to mental health implications arising from compassion fatigue, euthanasia, and other challenging aspects of the profession. This analysis employs social media listening and analysis to discern top themes arising from social and online media posts referencing veterinarians. Social media sentiment analysis is also employed to aid in quantifying the search results, in terms of whether they are positivity/negativity associated. From September 2017-November 2019, over 1.4 million posts and 1.7 million mentions were analyzed; the top domain in the search results was Twitter (74%). The mean net sentiment associated with the search conducted over the time period studied was 52%. The top terms revealed in the searches conducted revolved mainly around care of or concern for pet animals. The recognition of challenges facing the veterinary medicine profession were notably absent, except for the mention of suicide risks. While undeniably influenced by the search terms selected, which were directed towards client-clinic related verbiage, a relative lack of knowledge regarding veterinarians' roles in human health, food safety/security, and society generally outside of companion animal care was recognized. Future research aimed at determining the value of veterinarians' contributions to society and, in particular, in the scope of One Health, may aid in forming future communication and education campaigns.

Indexed as

public perceptionssocial media analyticsveterinarianveterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID32517251
PMCPMC7356892
OpenAlexW3034123207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.