Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517177›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma by Liquid Biopsy (Decalib Study): The ddPCR Challenge.

Audelaure Junca, Gaëlle Tachon, Camille Evrard, Claire Villalva, Eric Frouin, Lucie Karayan-Tapon, David Tougeron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Audelaure JuncaUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Gaëlle TachonUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-7143
Camille EvrardUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Claire VillalvaDepartment of Cancer Biology, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Eric FrouinUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Lucie Karayan-TaponUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
David TougeronUniversity of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8065-9635
Université de Poitiers · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Ligue Contre le Cancer NA"Sports et Collection" foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most countries, participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs with the immunological fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) is low. Mutations of RAS and BRAF occur early in colorectal carcinogenesis and "liquid biopsy" allows detection of mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This prospective study aims to evaluate the performance of RAS and BRAF-mutated ctDNA in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AA).

methodsOne hundred and thirty patients who underwent colonoscopy for suspicion of colorectal lesion were included and divided into four groups: 20 CRC, 39 AA, 31 non-advanced adenoma and/or hyperplastic polyp(s) (NAA) and 40 with no lesion. Mutated ctDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR.

resultsctDNA was detected in 45.0% of CRC, in 2.6% of AA and none of the NAA and "no-lesion" groups. All patients with stage II to IV mutated CRC had detectable ctDNA (

conclusionsctDNA had high sensitivity in detection of advanced mutated CRC but was unable to sensitively detect AA. ctDNA analysis was easy to perform and readily accepted by the population but requires combination with other circulating biomarkers before replacing iFOBT.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAcolorectal cancerdroplet digital PCRfecal occult blood testliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32517177
PMCPMC7352444
OpenAlexW3033676862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.