Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517138›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Speech Perception Changes in the Acoustically Aided, Nonimplanted Ear after Cochlear Implantation: A Multicenter Study.

Mario A Svirsky, Arlene C Neuman, Jonathan D Neukam, Annette Lavender, Margaret K Miller, Ksenia A Aaron, Piotr H Skarzynski, Katarzyna B Cywka, Henryk Skarzynski, Eric Truy and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Mario A SvirskyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9238-0682
Arlene C NeumanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Jonathan D NeukamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Annette LavenderCochlear Americas, Denver, CO 80124, USA.
Margaret K MillerHuman Auditory Development Lab, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5095-5927
Ksenia A AaronOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Piotr H SkarzynskiDepartment of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-1915
Katarzyna B CywkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngosurgery, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.
Henryk SkarzynskiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngosurgery, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-9851
Eric TruyINSERM U1028, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Equipe IMPACT, 69000 Lyon, France.
Fabien SeldranMedel France, 06160 Antibes, France.
Ruben HermannINSERM U1028, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Equipe IMPACT, 69000 Lyon, France.
Paul GovaertsDe Oorgroep, Herentalsebaan 75, B-2100 Antwerp-Deurne, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-9002
Geert De CeulaerDe Oorgroep, Herentalsebaan 75, B-2100 Antwerp-Deurne, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-2578
Francois BergeronUniversité Laval, 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-7749
Matthieu HottonUniversité Laval, 1050, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-0552
Michelle MoranThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.
Richard C DowellThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1122-0506
Maria Valeria Schmidt Goffi-GomezHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 05403-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Tereza de Matos MagalhãesHospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Av. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 05403-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosamaria SantarelliDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Pietro ScimemiDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5273-1938
New York University · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PLThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Padua · ITBoys Town National Research Hospital · USCochlear (United States) · USMedical University of Warsaw · PLStanford Medicine · US

Funding

MODELS OF SPEECH PERCEPTION BY COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERSR01DC003937 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SVIRSKY, MARIO A · 1999 to 2020
$7.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003937NIH HHS R01-DC011329NIH HHS R01-DC03937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing percentage of cochlear implant (CI) users who have usable residual hearing in the contralateral, nonimplanted ear, typically aided by acoustic amplification. This raises the issue of the extent to which the signal presented through the cochlear implant may influence how listeners process information in the acoustically stimulated ear. This multicenter retrospective study examined pre- to postoperative changes in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear, the implanted ear, and both together. Results in the latter two conditions showed the expected increases, but speech perception in the nonimplanted ear showed a modest yet meaningful decrease that could not be completely explained by changes in unaided thresholds, hearing aid malfunction, or several other demographic variables. Decreases in speech perception in the nonimplanted ear were more likely in individuals who had better levels of speech perception in the implanted ear, and in those who had better speech perception in the implanted than in the nonimplanted ear. This raises the possibility that, in some cases, bimodal listeners may rely on the higher quality signal provided by the implant and may disregard or even neglect the input provided by the nonimplanted ear.

Indexed as

auditory neglectbimodalcochlear implantsdeafnesshearing aidmulticenterspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID32517138
PMCPMC7356938
OpenAlexW3033875846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.