Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517123›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

Francesco Savino, Paola Montanari, Ilaria Galliano, Valentina Daprà, Massimiliano Bergallo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effectiveness ofTranslational pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infant formula with addedFrontiers in pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The effect of symbiotic in the treatment of infantile colic: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Probiotic Properties ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco SavinoDepartment of Pediatrics, S.S.D. Subintensive Neonatal Care, Children Hospital "Regina Margherita", A.U.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Paola MontanariDipartimento delle Scienze di Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Scuola di Medicina, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Ilaria GallianoDipartimento delle Scienze di Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Scuola di Medicina, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Valentina DapràDipartimento delle Scienze di Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Scuola di Medicina, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Massimiliano BergalloDipartimento delle Scienze di Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Scuola di Medicina, 10126 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of

methodsForty-five colicky breastfed infants were consecutively randomized to receive

resultsAfter supplementation for 28 days with

conclusionInfants treated with

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDietDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusAdultAnimalsColicFecesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMilkLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexfaecal calprotectininfantile colicLactobacillusLactobacillus rhamnosus (ATCC 53103)total bacteria

Identifiers

PMID32517123
PMCPMC7352391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.