Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32517118›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

The Effects of a Supermarket-Based Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Private-Label Foods: A Prospective Study.

Daisy H Coyle, Jason Hy Wu, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Maria Shahid, Fraser Taylor, Bruce Neal, Helen Trevena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sustaining Health Promotion in Australian Supermarkets: Qualitative Perspectives From the Reach for the Stars Programme.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daisy H CoyleThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-0671
Jason Hy WuThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2073-3562
Gian Luca Di TannaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5470-3567
Maria ShahidThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Fraser TaylorThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.
Helen TrevenaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0389-812X

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1117300National Health and Medical Research Council APP1167745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Private-label products, products owned by supermarkets, are a growing area of the food supply. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an intervention that provided an Australian supermarket ('intervention supermarket') with comparative nutrition data to improve the healthiness of their private-label range. Between 2015 and 2016, the intervention supermarket received reports that ranked the nutritional quality of their products against competitors. Changes in the nutrient content (sodium, sugar, saturated fat, energy and Health Star Rating) of products from the intervention supermarket between 2015 and 2018 were compared against changes achieved for three comparators (private-label products from two other supermarkets and branded products). The intervention supermarket achieved a significantly greater reduction in the sodium content of their products relative to all three comparators, which ranged between -104 and -52 mg/100 g (all

Indexed as

Food AnalysisFood IndustryFood LabelingFood MarketsFood QualityFood SupplyNutritive ValueAustraliaChloratesFatty AcidsNutrientsProspective StudiesSodium Chloride, DietaryChloratesFatty AcidsNutrientssodium chlorateSodium Chloride, DietaryHealth Star Ratingprivate labelreformulationsaturated fatsodiumsugarsupermarket

Identifiers

PMID32517118
PMCPMC7353040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.